Moral Theology: A Complete Course Based on St. Thomas Aquinas and the Best Modern AuthoritiesCallan, Charles J. (Charles Jerome)
Religion
Moral Theology: A Complete Course Based on St. Thomas Aquinas and the Best Modern Authorities
Callan, Charles J. (Charles Jerome)
Christian ethics -- Catholic authors
(c) Apostasy which extends to infidelity is also twofold: before God
and before the Church. The first kind is committed by any person
who really had faith, even though unbaptized or not a Catholic; the
second kind is committed only by those who were baptized and were
Catholics. Examples: A catechumen who accepted Christianity and asked
for Baptism, becomes an apostate before God if he abandons his belief
and purpose and goes back to paganism. Similarly, a person brought up
as a Lutheran becomes an apostate before God, if he abandons all belief
in Christianity. But the crime of apostasy of which the Church takes
cognizance is the desertion of Christianity by a baptized Catholic.
(d) A Catholic apostatizes from Christianity, either privatively (by
merely renouncing all belief in Christ), or contrarily (by taking up
some form of unbelief, such as indifferentism or free thought, or by
joining some infidel sect, such as Mohammedanism or Confucianism).
836. What was said above regarding the gravity, divisions, penalties
and absolution of heresy, can be applied also to apostasy.
887. As to the comparative gravity of sins of apostasy, the following
should be noted. (a) Apostasy is not a species of sin distinct from
heresy, since both are essentially the same in malice, being rejections
of the authority of divine revelation; but it is a circumstance that
aggravates the malice of unbelief, since it is more sweeping than
heresy (see 822, 824). (b) Apostasy into one form of infidelity is
not specifically different from apostasy into another, but the form
of infidelity is an aggravating or extenuating circumstance. Example:
Paganism is further from faith than Mohammedanism; atheism further than
paganism.
838. Could one ever have a just reason for abandoning the Catholic
Church or remaining outside its faith? (a) Objectively speaking, there
can never be a just cause for giving up Catholicism or for refusing
to embrace it. For the Catholic Church is the only true Church, and
it is the will of Christ that all should join it. (b) Subjectively
speaking, there may be a just cause for leaving or not entering the
Church, namely, the fact that a person, ignorant in this matter but
in good faith, believes that the Catholic Church is not the true
Church. For one is obliged to follow an erroneous conscience, and,
if the error is invincible, one is excused from sin (see 581-583).
Examples: A Protestant taught to believe that the teachings of the
Church are idolatrous, superstitious and absurd, is not blamed for not
accepting them. A Catholic, poorly instructed in religion and thrown
in with non-Catholic and anti-Catholic associates, might become really
persuaded, and without sinning against faith itself, that it was his
duty to become a Protestant.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account