Moral Theology: A Complete Course Based on St. Thomas Aquinas and the Best Modern AuthoritiesCallan, Charles J. (Charles Jerome)
Religion
Moral Theology: A Complete Course Based on St. Thomas Aquinas and the Best Modern Authorities
Callan, Charles J. (Charles Jerome)
Christian ethics -- Catholic authors
(b) Blasphemy is expressed even by short words, or by a grunt or snort
of contempt. Example: To utter the name of our Lord in a contumelious
way signifies that one regards Him as of no account. The word
“hocus-pocus” is sometimes used in derision of the Mass or other sacred
rites.
(c) Blasphemy is expressed by acts that signify disbelief and dishonor,
for example, to spit or shake one’s fist at heaven, to turn up the nose
or make a wry face at the mention of God, to trample in the dust a
crucifix, etc.
894. Rules for Interpreting Cases of Doubtful Blasphemy.--(a)
Custom or usage is a better guide than etymology or grammar in
discovering whether a blasphemous meaning is contained in certain
common expressions of an ambiguous character. Examples: According to
signification the phrase, “Sacred Name of God,” is harmless and might
be a pious ejaculation, but according to the sense in which it is taken
in French it curses God and is blasphemous. According to signification,
the expression “Ye gods” in English, “Thousand names of God” in French,
“Thousand Sacraments” in German, are blasphemous; but according to
the sense in which they are used by the people they merely express
surprise, and are at most a venial sin of irreverence. The English
language as a whole is singularly free from blasphemous expressions,
just as English classic literature as a whole is singularly free from
obscenity.
(b) The dispositions or feelings of the user are a better index of the
presence or absence of blasphemy than the mere words, if the latter
are capable of various senses. If doubt persists about the sense of an
ambiguous expression that could be blasphemous, it may be held that
no blasphemy was intended. Examples: Titus, a good man, is so annoyed
trying to correct his children that he exclaims: “Why did the Lord
ever send me such pests?” Balbus, who is a hater of religion, answers
him: “Who is to blame if they are pests?” Since Titus is habitually
religious and Balbus habitually irreligious, the question of the former
sounds like irritation, the question of the latter like blasphemy.
Claudius is a very religious-minded man, but he meets with a series
of calamities which so stun him that he exclaims: “I must be only a
step-child of God. Certainly, He cares little for me. Why did He ever
create me?” The sentiment seems to be one of grief and wonder rather
than of insult to God. Balbus is very devoted to his mother, and often
addresses her in hyperbolic language, saying that he adores her, that
she is the goddess at Whose shrine he worships, his supreme beatitude,
etc. Taken literally, these expressions are blasphemous, but as used by
Balbus they are harmless.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account