Morality as a Religion: An exposition of some first principlesSullivan, W. R. Washington (William Robert Washington)
Religion
Morality as a Religion: An exposition of some first principles
Sullivan, W. R. Washington (William Robert Washington)
Conduct of life; Ethics; Religion and ethics
And there is one other unmistakable evidence that the stream of
tendency is in our direction. I allude to the predominant influence in
our age of science, not merely physical, but science in all its
departments. It is welcome to us as the very handwriting of the
Eternal, as a revelation of the workings of the Infinite Mind. Every
new discovery is welcomed by us as a further revelation of the Being
who "is for ever reason".
But to the "little systems" science can only be welcome in so far as it
fits in with the petty scale upon which their theologies and
theosophies have constructed the universe. At first, everything is
passionately denied, a cry of horror goes up in the land that science
is engaged in an attempt to dethrone the God of their theology. And
then a few years elapse, and for very shame's sake they set about
explaining how that the "God of knowledge" [1] has much in common with
their theosophical Deity, and that by a dexterous manipulation of
infallible texts and articles of religion, a _modus vivendi_ may be
arranged between the two. This is the kind of dialectic that goes on
at every Church Congress--men who know in their hearts that the
"inspired" anthropology of the Bible is contradicted, fully, flatly,
irreconcilably, by the undeniable facts discovered by science, continue
to mystify themselves and their hearers alike by all the pleadings,
glosses, evasions and refinements at their command, with a view to what
they call a "reconciliation between science and religion".
Science and religion, we protest, need no reconciliation, for they
never were at war. Not religion, but pseudo-philosophy and so-called
theology--this it is to which science is an implacable and
irreconcilable foe. And she will never cease from her determined
opposition until the ecclesiastical idol vacates the very last niche it
occupies in its "chapel," clothes itself with the white robe of
contrition, and sits humbly upon the stool of repentance awaiting a
scientific absolution.
For us, such reconciliation is an unmeaning phrase. We never professed
to follow aught but reason's kindly light, for that we _know_ to be the
Divine Light in us. And, therefore, all that comes to us in reason's
name, comes accredited, as though from the innermost court of the Great
Presence itself. We discard nothing but what offends reason and its
ascertained laws; we bring everything before its bar. Science is to us
a Divine revelation, its teachings are among our inspired literature.
No need therefore of reconciliation between religion and science when
we resolve both, as in a final synthesis, into the root fact of all
this wondrous universe--eternal reason. And because of this, a faith
such as ours is part of the order of imperishable realities, for the
kingdom of reason, like the throne of the Eternal, is for ever and ever.
[1] _Deus Scientiarum Dominus._
XVII.
"THE OVER-SOUL."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account