Motherhood and the Relationships of the SexesHartley, C. Gasquoine (Catherine Gasquoine)
Philosophy
Motherhood and the Relationships of the Sexes
Hartley, C. Gasquoine (Catherine Gasquoine)
Mothers; Sex; Women -- Social and moral questions
The same unusual family conditions prevail with the rhea and the emu,
and also among the painted snipes, cassowaries, tinamous, and some of
the button-quails.[31] There are probably instances of other birds, but
I do not know of details of their habits; Wallace[32] also mentions
several species in different parts of the world, among whom all care
of the young falls entirely upon the father. In all these bird families
exactly opposite conditions prevail to what we are accustomed. It
should be specially noted that these unnatural (I use the word simply
to mean unusual) mothers are larger and more vividly coloured than the
hard-worked fathers; in all such cases polyandry is practised.
Why is this?
The only attempt at an explanation that I have been able to discover is
given by Mr. Pycraft in his fascinating book, _The Courtship of Animals_.
He says—[33]
“The solution of this problem probably lies with the
physiologist. We now know that the problem of sex does not
rest merely in the complete development of the primary sexual
organs; we know that fertile unions do not depend merely on the
act of pairing, but on the functional activity of the ancillary
glands. And it may well be that some change in the character
of the secretions has not only affected the numerical values
of the sexes, but reversed the normal rôle of coloration and
behaviour.”
Mr. Pycraft does not consider that the polyandrous habits of these birds
are due primarily to a preponderance of the females in the species over
the males, but holds that this condition must rather be regarded as
having arisen from a transference to the females, or development in them,
of increased sexual hunger, which intensity of passion would tend to
lead to an exhaustion of the males. This is exceedingly interesting. Mr.
Pycraft continues—
“Neither polygamy nor polyandry among the lower animals, at any
rate, has been brought about or is maintained by the excessive
death rate due to combats for the possession of mates, but
must be explained as demonstrating inherent changes in the
germ-plasm, disturbing the relative proportions of the sexes
and correlated with a profound transformation, not only in
the behaviour of the sexes during the period of reproductive
activity, but also in their physical characteristics.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account