Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 2 (of 4).—1857-1874Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
History
Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 2 (of 4).—1857-1874
Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901 -- Humor
But it soon swelled to more vocal dimensions. It was one thing to check
the extravagances of "indelicate and obtrusive loyalty"; it was another
to maintain an almost Oriental aloofness. The subject is returned to
again and again, in prose and verse, and in two cartoons by Tenniel:
notably that of "Queen Hermione" in 1865. But the candour of _Punch_
reaches its highest level in his comments on the announcement early in
1866 of the institution of a new decoration--the Albert Medal.
[Sidenote: _The "Effete Monarchy"_]
_Mr. Punch's_ loyalty has been proved too often for question.
Without the slightest apology, therefore, he proceeds to say what
he would have preferred to leave unsaid, for it is not the part of
a true friend to be silent when he should speak. _Mr. Punch_ has
cordially approved every reasonable effort to preserve the memory
of the good Prince whose loss we all deplore. Statues, in far
greater number than ever was accorded to an English Worthy, have
been reared in honour of the lamented Consort. Though it is now
just sixty years since Nelson was laid in St. Paul's, our great
sea-captain's monument is unfinished--we hear nothing at all of the
national monument to our great land-captain, though it is more than
thirteen years since Wellington was laid by the side of Nelson--but
the most splendid and costly of memorials is rapidly rising, in the
Park, in testimony of our veneration for Prince Albert. When this
shall have been completed, will it not be almost time to leave that
good man's fame to take care of itself? Society is at least half
inclined to believe that enough has been done in this way, and it
will not be well that society should begin to smile at persistent
efforts to add tribute to tribute. There is really no fitness in
giving the Prince's name to the medal that is to reward the noblest
of sea-service.
The Prince had no kind of connexion with or special regard for
sea-achievements, though the irreverent may remark that his own
courage was shown when he voyaged, inasmuch as he notoriously
suffered on such occasions more than anyone else on board. Anything
like ridicule should not be permitted to connect itself with an
honoured memory.
The Albert Medal, as we know, was not restricted to those who exhibited
conspicuous gallantry in the rescue of life from shipwreck, and the
remarks we have quoted may very well have contributed to its being
awarded in recognition of heroic deeds on land as well. A fortnight
later a passage quoted from the _New York Herald_ impelled _Punch_ to
reaffirm his loyalty to the Monarchy:--
England is completely prepared to become Republican, but the
undoubted personal popularity of the Queen will probably sustain
the effete monarchy until the time arrives for transmission of the
Crown. But as for an Edward the Seventh, that is out of the
question.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account