Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 2 (of 4).—1857-1874Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
History
Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 2 (of 4).—1857-1874
Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901 -- Humor
The declaration is signed by a great number of eminent men at home
and abroad, and its point is to insist that people of the present
day dress so hideously that they will not make pictures. A
transitional change is recommended, and the Declarers
affectionately remind the public that so long as they make Guys of
themselves at the instigation of tailors and milliners, portraits
have no value except as family memorials, whereas, if we dressed
properly, the artists would make us into tableaux which the whole
world should admire. All this is perfectly true, but what is to be
done? How are we to extricate ourselves from the tyranny of the
tailor and the milliner? This the Declarers do not tell us, nor was
it to be expected perhaps that they should advise us how to conduct
a rebellion. But why do they not tell us how they would like us to
dress? Men, for instance. Are they to come out with a choice array
of colour, and with a picturesquely cut garb, and that general
ampleness and nobleness in treatment of costume, which bespeaks the
grand and heroic in the wearer?
[Sidenote: _The Briton Abroad_]
At this point _Punch_ deviates into absurdity. But the main argument is
sound. As a transition, however, to the subject of men's dress, another
deliverance serves our purpose even better. _Punch_ loved to criticize
and even carp at his countrymen and countrywomen, but he did not easily
suffer any infringement of his prerogative. And so, when a correspondent
of _The Times_ fell foul of the dowdiness of Englishmen and Englishwomen
abroad, he was up in arms at once:--
_The Times_ abuses John Bull, and Madame son Épouse, for going
about on their travels got up as Guys--for shocking foreign
prejudices, and showing their contempt for foreign opinion, by
sporting eccentric shooting-coats, flaming flannel shirts, reckless
wide-awakes--and worse still on the ladies' part, by the general
shabbiness and ugliness of their travelling toilettes and headgear.
Now, making every allowance for the desperate necessities of
newspaper writers in the dead season, and admitting that British
travellers--male and female--include specimens both of the Guy and
the Gorilla, _Mr. Punch_ must put in his protest against any such
wholesale indictment as this of his compatriots en voyage. On the
contrary he is prepared to maintain, after surveying mankind from
Calais to Calatafimi ... that, as a rule, the wearer of the best
travelling suit (for stuff, cut, and condition together), the
cleanest shirt, the least ragamuffin or ridiculous hat, the
soundest and shapeliest foot-covering, is a Briton.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account