Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 3 (of 4).—1874-1892Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
History
Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 3 (of 4).—1874-1892
Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901 -- Humor
The fine Old Country Gentleman has an Elizabethan mansion,
But what the dickens is the good of that if his means continually
narrow in proportion to
His family's expansion?
If he gives up his deer, and sells his timber, dismisses his
servants, and thinks of advertising his house for a grammar
school,
Or a lunatic asylum
(As he often has to do), what is there in his lot to excite the
jealousy of those darned Radicals, though the common comfort of
that poor _caput lupinum_, the Land Owner, on however little
a scale
Seems invariably to rile 'em?
Asks the fine Old Country Gentleman, one of the modern time.
With an encumbered property, diminishing rent-roll, and expenses
beyond his income,
The question which confronts him at every corner is, whence will the
needful "tin" come?
And when they prate to us about our "improvidence," and advise us to
"cut down" and economize, why, where, in the name of patience,
I ask'll
Be the pull of being a Country Gentleman at all, if one has to live
like a retired pork-butcher or prosperous publican, and perhaps
you will answer
That question, Mr. Charles Milnes Gaskell![8]
Of the fine Old Country Gentleman, one of the modern time.
[Footnote 8: This gentleman had recently written an article on the
subject in the _Nineteenth Century_.]
The "profiteer" was already in Society and on the moors; _Punch_
reviled him in "My 'art's in the 'Ighlands," and in a picture of an
opulent Semite swearing that he hasn't "a drop of Hebrew blood in ma
veinth, 'thelp me." Du Maurier created Sir Gorgius Midas as typical
of the New Plutocracy--a gross, bediamonded figure, surrounded by
flunkeys, with Dukes and Duchesses as his pensioners. The alleged
poverty-stricken condition of the aristocracy is a frequent theme: one
ducal family can only afford to go to the opera when Sir Gorgius lends
them his box. But the Dukes still had their uses. The Beresford Midases
put their boy's name down both for Eton and Harrow, and decided to send
him to whichever has most "dooks" when the time comes. The New Rich
show themselves apt pupils in all the snobbery of rank. For example,
Sir Gorgius is shocked at the innovation of ladies and gentlemen riding
in or on omnibuses. This is not documentary evidence, of course, but it
was perfectly legitimate caricature. Du Maurier was not attacking the
self-made man whose creed is summed up in the Lancashire saying: "Them
as 'as brass don't care a damn what them as 'asn't thinks on 'em." He
bestowed his ridicule impartially on the servile plutocrats who aped
the customs of the titled classes, and the aristocrats who were unable
to grow poor with dignity. Du Maurier's contribution to the social
history of the middle and later Victorian age was invaluable on its
critical and satirical side. But he was emphatically an aristocrat in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account