Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 3 (of 4).—1874-1892Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
History
Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 3 (of 4).—1874-1892
Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901 -- Humor
Yet in the next two years Millais is criticized for sacrificing
character to "prettiness" and desecrating his talent by placing
it at the disposal of the advertiser. Watts's enigmatic "Hope" was
"guyed" in 1887 under the title "Cutting off her head with a saw."
The multifarious activities of Herkomer--painter, etcher, director of
a school of art at Bushey, designer of posters, operatic composer,
etc.--did not escape _Punch's_ amused notice. _Punch_ himself, as might
readily be expected, did not enjoy an immunity from art criticism. In
1883 he had congratulated Ruskin on his second election to the Slade
Professorship at Oxford; at the end of the year Ruskin repaid the
compliment, in his lectures on the Art of England, by a long detailed
and in the main highly eulogistic survey of _Punch's_ artistic work.
But the panegyric was tempered by certain reserves:--
Says Mr. Ruskin, having before him in review one or two selected
specimens of _Mr. Punch's_ cartoons:--
"Look, too, at this characteristic type of British heroism--'John Bull
guards his pudding.' Is this the final outcome of King Arthur and
Saint George, of Britannia and the British Lion? And is it your pride
or hope or pleasure that in this sacred island that has given her lion
hearts to Eastern tombs and her Pilgrim Fathers to Western lands, that
has wrapped the sea round her as a mantle, and breathed against her
strong bosom the air of every wind, the children born to her in these
latter days should have no loftier legend to write upon their shields
than 'John Bull guards his Pudding'?"
And then Mr. Ruskin, as if conscious that the very onward sweep of
his own free fancy has carried him beyond the limits of fair and
reasonable estimate, as it were, harks somewhat back again, and
offering _Mr. Punch_ something in the nature of an apology, acquits
him of all true responsibility for this same terrible and offending
"pudding":--
"It is our fault" (proceeds Mr. Ruskin) "and not the Artist's; and I
have often wondered what Mr. Tenniel might have done for us if London
had been as Venice, or Florence, or Siena. In my first course of
Lectures I called your attention to the Picture of the Doge Mocenigo
kneeling in prayer; and it is our fault more than Mr. Tenniel's if he
is forced to represent the heads of the Government dining at Greenwich
rather than worshipping at St. Paul's."
[Sidenote: _Punch's Virtues as an Art Critic_]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account