Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 3 (of 4).—1874-1892Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
History
Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 3 (of 4).—1874-1892
Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901 -- Humor
Why on earth does Mr. Irving yearn for the companionship of Bishops?
Does he want to convert them all to Irvingism, and to come and listen
to him discoursing Shakespearean Inspirations in Unknown Tongues? Does
he require Church Patronage for the Stage, and his Theatre Stalls
filled as those of a Cathedral are with Prebends, Minor Canons and
Greater Guns of the Ecclesiastical Establishment? Is it the height
of an Actor's ambition to swell the crowd of distinguished Nobodies
at the Duchess of Mountrouge's reception, or to appear as a great
attraction of Lady Doubtful's Assemblies, and to be able to exhibit
cards of fashionable "At Homes" in the mirror which is held up to
Nature over his mantelpiece?
Elevation of the Stage forsooth! We should have thought that the Stage
had elevated Mr. Irving above all such twaddle as this.
"Act well your part, there all the honour lies."
Be satisfied with this: Live for your Art, not for that limited,
narrow, uncharitable, scandalmongering section of the great public
which calls itself "Society," and which loves to patronize Art in any
form at the least possible cost to itself.
Even harsher is the rebuke administered three weeks later to Irving
for his self-laudatory speeches, and the unnecessary autobiographical
reminiscences in which he contrasted his present with his past
earnings, thus creating a false impression of one who was in reality
the most generous of men. The petting of actors by society appealed to
_Punch_ no more than the invasion of the stage by amateurs; he regarded
such favouritism as ministering to their worst infirmity, vanity; and
in 1884 he fell foul of Mrs. Kendal's speech at the Social Science
Congress on the social position of actors, in which she reprobated
self-advertisement (Satan rebuking Sin, according to her critic), but
claimed a recognition which _Punch_ denounced as mere snobbishness. Of
Ellen Terry, who was associated with Irving at the Lyceum from 1878,
_Punch_ remained the affectionate and benevolent admirer, though he
admitted that her conception of Lady Macbeth in 1889 raised a good deal
of legitimate criticism. The lavish mounting of the Lyceum revivals, I
may add, exercised _Punch's_ frugal mind, and reached a climax in the
production of _Henry VIII_ in 1892.
[Illustration: THE NEW CRAZE
Scene--_The Green-Room of the Parthenon, before rehearsal_.
HARD-WORKING BARONET: "Here's the Duke, confound him! Only
been six months on the stage, and getting twenty guineas a week!"
CONSCIENTIOUS VISCOUNT: "Yes, and us only getting six after
ten years of it. I hate these beastly Dukes coming and spoiling the
profession!"
AMBITIOUS EARL: "Ugh! I hate all amateurs, hang 'em, taking
the bread out of one's mouth!"]
[Sidenote: _Idols of the 'Eighties_]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account