Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 3 (of 4).—1874-1892Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
History
Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 3 (of 4).—1874-1892
Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901 -- Humor
[Sidenote: _Punch the Anti-Wagnerite_]
All these events and many others came under _Punch's_ notice, but
it must be confessed that his shortcomings as a critic are nowhere
so conspicuous as in the domain of music. It is true that in 1875 he
expressed a guarded admiration for _Lohengrin_: he found it good in
parts, like the curate's egg. "Though not melodious, it is certainly
most musically interesting and abundantly poetical." But the report
of his Bayreuth correspondent in 1876 is admittedly a bogus document,
compiled from German phrase-books in London, and tells us nothing about
the music, for the writer never went to Bayreuth. The Albert Hall
Festival is treated much in the same spirit of entirely irresponsible
burlesque. _Punch_ is determined at all costs to represent the Festival
as a carnival of "Wagnerian waggeries." When it was over he admitted
that many who went to scoff remained to praise. "The _Rhinegold_ is a
masterpiece," but he, is careful to add "this is not a discovery of
mine," and goes on to express his deliberate opinion that the Tetralogy
must inevitably be vulgarized by representation on the stage. "Such a
_mise-en-scène_ as the _Ring_ demands is impossible," and he turns with
obvious relief to discuss Patti in _Dinorah_ and the performance of
_Orphée aux Enfers_ at the Alhambra.
In 1882 _Punch_ attended the performances of the _Ring_, and after four
nights "deliberately" said, "Never again with you, _Wotan, Siegfried &
Co._" He found nothing new in the idea of leading motives: it was as
old as the oldest pantomime. A few weeks later _Punch_ heard _Tristan_
done at Drury Lane and was bored to extinction:--
Had it been by a young English composer, or an elderly English
composer of the Hanwellian School, it would not have been tolerated
for half an hour after its commencement. For ourselves, if of two
penances we had to choose one, either to sit out a long, dull sermon
in a stuffy church on an August afternoon, or to hear one Act of
_Tristan and Isolda_, we should unhesitatingly select the former,
where, at all events, there would be the certainty of a tranquil
repose, from which no cruel drum, bassoon, or violoncello, but only
the snoring of our own nose, could rouse us. That there are occasional
snatches of melody is undeniable, but a snatch here and there is not
the grasp of a master hand to hold an audience. Judicious selections
will always be welcome; but that, taken as a whole, it is the
embodiment of stupendous boredom, might be the verdict of all English
opera-goers who delight in the Operas of Rossini, Mozart, Meyerbeer,
Gounod, Verdi, Balfe, Wallace, Bizet, and we are not afraid to add,
even in these days of æsthetic mysticism, art-vagueness, and higher
cultchaw--Bellini.
_Punch_ then proceeds to "guy" the libretto and stage directions and
continues:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account