Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 4 (of 4).—1892-1914Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
History
Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 4 (of 4).—1892-1914
Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901 -- Humor
_Punch_ distrusted Socialism because, in his view, it led in practice
to vicarious generosity. The Socialist would give half of everything,
so long as he didn't possess it himself. Yet in apportioning the
blame for the railway trouble in 1907, _Punch_ did not spare Capital.
Railway directors and trade unions were in his cartoon shown as equally
animated by a disregard for the interests of the public. Incidentally
we may note that the volunteer service rendered by the general public
in 1919 is anticipated in a humorous sketch of the experiences of an
amateur porter. _Punch_, even where he felt strongly, was alive to the
extravagances of the extremists on his own side, witness the verses
in 1908 which purport to express the perplexity of "an open-minded
beggar":--
[Sidenote: "_The Open-minded Beggar_"]
Reader, tell me, if you know,
What, on earth, is Socialism.
Is it--men have told me so--
Some preposterous abysm,
Into which we all may drop--
With the criminals on top?
Is the vehement _Express_
Justified in all it mentions;
And are Wells and G. B. S.
Worse than _Sikes_ in their intentions?
Do those Fabian beasts of prey
Wish to take my wife away?
Or--observe that I am quite
Open-minded, gentle reader--
Are they sometimes nearly right
In the shocking _Labour Leader_?
Will the coming Commune be
Paradise for you and me?
Do you think it can be true
That the death of competition
Guarantees for me and you
Sinless Edens--new edition?
Or was Stuart Mill correct--
Will there be some grave defect?
Shall we all be servile wrecks
With the brand of Marx imprinted
On our miserable necks,
As _The Referee_ has hinted?
Or--see _Justice_--shall we share
Perfect freedom with the air?
Will that entity, the State
Of Collectivist Utopia,
Actually operate
Something like a cornucopia?
Or will Hardie's fatted friends
Leave me only odds and ends?
In this monster maze of doubt
I am groping like a blind man.
Shall I boldly blossom out
As a follower of Hyndman?
Or continue to exist
As an Individualist?
So, dear reader, will you, please,
Tell a poor, distracted Briton
Whom, in troubled times like these,
He should put his little bit on?
And, philosopher and guide,
_Do_ pick out the winning side!
_Punch's_ comment on the Eight Hours Bill is influenced by the
objections of those who opposed it on the ground that it would affect
the cost of all the necessaries of life. King Coal observes, "This
means that I shall have to reduce my output," and Commerce rejoins,
"Then I shall have to reduce mine, too," and both agree in doubting
whether the Government had ever thought of this inevitable result.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account