Marriage -- Fiction; Washington (D.C.) -- Social life and customs -- Fiction
The committee–room was only moderately full. The hearings had been
open, but the crush had been so great that it was decided to exclude
all except those who were directly interested in the hearing and those
lucky enough to get cards of admission. It was an eager and even a
sympathetic crowd. The same personal charm which had been a great
factor in Clavering’s success was still his. As he sat back, his
leonine face and head outlined against the crimson wall behind him,
his eyes full of the light of combat, cool, resolute, and smiling, it
was impossible not to admire him. He had no great virtues, but he had
certain great qualities.
As the hearing proceeded, Clavering’s case grew blacker. Against some
of the most damning facts he had some strong perjured evidence, but
the perjurers were exposed with the evidence. Against all, he had his
own strenuous denial of everything and the call for proof. But proof
was forthcoming at every point. And it was all Richard Baskerville’s
handiwork. Clavering knew this so well that although perfectly alert as
to the statements made by the keen–eyed, sharp–witted lawyers from New
York, he kept his eyes fixed on Baskerville, who was handing out paper
after paper and making whispered explanations—who was, in short, the
arsenal for the weapons so mercilessly used against Clavering.
The two men engaged in this deadly and tremendous strife, which
involved not only millions of money and a seat in the United States
Senate, but also the characters and souls of men, eyed each other with
a certain respect. It was no man of ordinary mould whom Baskerville had
sought to destroy, and that Clavering would be destroyed there was no
reasonable doubt. The last day’s work meant expulsion from the Senate,
a disgrace so huge, so far–reaching, that it was worse than sentencing
a man to death. Apart from the degree of honesty in Clavering’s own
party, it was perfectly well understood that no party would dare to
go before the country assuming the burden of the gigantic frauds
of which he was being convicted. And it was due to Baskerville that
the evidence to convict had been found. All that the other lawyers
had done was insignificant beside the two years of patient research,
the disentangling of a thousand complicated legal threads, which
was Baskerville’s work. Some of the evidence he presented had been
collected in the wildest parts of the West and South at the imminent
risk of his life; all of it had required vast labor and learning.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account