Actresses -- Great Britain -- Biography; Siddons, Sarah, 1755-1831
In the case of Brereton, the same unfortunate sensitiveness seems to have
been at work. Brereton was the leading actor of her troupe, always played
lover to her heroine, and, it was said, had at one time made his love
in so earnest a fashion, that the beautiful actress had, as in the case
of Daly, to check his ardour, or, as Boaden expresses it, “in kindling
his imagination the divinity unsettled his reason, and in clasping the
goddess he became sensible of the charms of the woman.” However this may
be, Brereton was by no means friendly, and never missed an opportunity of
covertly attacking her. When asked, therefore, to play for his benefit,
she actually deducted ten pounds from the profits as her own emolument.
Percy Fitzgerald seems inclined to think that “all this wretched muddle
was the work of Mr. Siddons, who, considering the charitable taxes laid
on her, and the many benefits she had to assist, found himself obliged,
like most husbands of money-getting actresses, to bargain and chaffer for
her gifts as if they were wares, and get as much money as they could be
made to bring in.”
But we think that at no time of their married life had Siddons enough
influence to induce her to do anything against her better judgment, and
we doubt very much whether he was ever allowed to complete a bargain
of any kind, although his name was frequently used. What aroused the
sympathy of the public more warmly in the cause of Brereton was the
madness that subsequently fell upon him.
The best side of her character was ever called out by adversity. It was
perhaps undignified to defend herself as she did—or, rather, as Siddons
did in her name—by an exculpatory letter to the papers, appealing to
the two actors, Digges and Brereton, to declare whether she had, or had
not, played for them when asked. Two letters were thus extorted from
them declaring that she had done all that was necessary to satisfy the
calls of charity, &c. Nothing could be conceived more fatal to her cause
than all this bandying of evidence. The idol men set up to worship they
generally delight to drag down and trample under foot if they dare. In
this case, however, they might insult and humiliate, but they could not
drag their victim from the high estate she had achieved.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account