Munsey's Magazine, Vol. VI, No. 1, October 1891Various
History
Munsey's Magazine, Vol. VI, No. 1, October 1891
Various
American periodicals
It may be gathered from the preceding article that we believe in the
exercise of the government’s powers for the encouragement of American
industries and the protection of American labor. We are also patriotic
enough to think that America is a civilized country, and that a policy of
hostility to foreign art is unworthy of her. Art knows no international
boundaries and is not a mere matter of dollars and cents. Even if it
were, the prohibition or restriction of importations would make us poorer
and not richer. Inspection of representative work from abroad is in a
hundred ways beneficial to our own educational, artistic, and mechanical
advancement. All this has been so fully and frequently pointed out, that
we may hope some day to see it recognized in our fiscal system. The
McKinley bill did indeed take a step in the right direction by reducing
the duty on paintings and statuary from thirty to fifteen per cent ad
valorem, leaving the tariff upon photographs, etchings, and all kinds of
prints at twenty five per cent. It is difficult to see why the arguments
that led Congress to cut off one half the tax upon paintings should not
apply with equal force to the abolition of the other half. The Treasury
order excluding photographs from the mails is surely oppressive enough
to excite forcible protests. It is true that the ruling is in strict
accordance with the letter of the law, which had previously been in
abeyance. The annoyances—individually trifling, perhaps, but collectively
serious—that its enforcement will cause, may result in strengthening the
demand for the liberation of art from the customs officials.
DEFECTS IN OUR PENAL CODE.
Nineteenth century ingenuity has identified and christened the science
of penology, but has hitherto failed to make any thorough application of
its principles. The practical side of the matter is indeed in a state
of partial chaos. Take, for instance, the various contemporary methods
of dealing with homicides. England hangs them, France guillotines them,
Spain garottes them, New York invokes electrical science to slay them
with artificial lightning. The great West takes them without any tiresome
legal process and suspends them upon the nearest tree. And meanwhile
the best thought of the day seems to be turning toward the opinion that
capital punishment in any form is unjust and inexpedient.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account