Musical Portraits : Interpretations of Twenty Modern ComposersRosenfeld, Paul
History
Musical Portraits : Interpretations of Twenty Modern Composers
Rosenfeld, Paul
Composers; Music -- 19th century -- History and criticism; Music -- 20th century -- History and criticism
smile, a gesture, a brief phrase, would reverberate. No one has caressed
it more lightly, more tenderly, more voluptuously. No one has made of
the piano-trill, for instance, more luminous and quivering a thing. And
because he was so sensitive to his medium, the medium lured from out him
his creative strength.
He grew to his high poetic stature from an elegant and aristocratic
craftsman of the school of Chopin. More than that of any modern master,
his art is rooted in the great romantic tradition as it comes to us
through Chopin, Wagner, Liszt and Strauss; and develops almost logically
out of it. And in the compositions of his first period, the period that
ends, roughly, with the piano concerto, the allegiance is marked, the
discipleship undeniable. The influence of Chopin is ubiquitous.
Scriabine writes mazurkas, preludes, etudes, nocturnes and waltzes in
his master's cool, polite, fastidious general manner. These pieces, too,
might seem to have been written in order to be played in noble salons
lit by massive candelabra, to countesses with bare shoulders. The
twenty-four preludes Opus 11, for instance, are full of Chopinesque
turns, of Chopinesque morbidezza, of Chopinesque melodies. The harmonic
scheme rarely transgresses the limits which Chopin set himself. The
pieces are obviously the work of one who in the course of
concert-playing has come to discover the finesses of the Pole's
workmanship. And yet, Cesar Cui's caustic description of the preludes as
"Bits filched from Chopin's trousseau," is eminently unjust. For even in
those days, when Scriabine was a member of the Russian salon school,
there were attractive original elements in his compositions. There is
real poetry and freshness in these soft-colored pieces. The treatment of
the instrument is bold, and, at moments, more satisfactory than
Chopin's. Scriabine, for instance, gives the left hand a greater
independence and significance than does as a rule his master. Nor does
he indulge in the repetitions and recapitulations that mar so many of
the latter's works. His sense of form is already alert. And through the
silken melodic line, the sweet, rich harmonies, there already makes
itself felt something that is to Chopin's spirit as Russian iron is to
Polish silver.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account