Mussolini as revealed in his political speeches (November 1914-August 1923)Mussolini, Benito
History
Mussolini as revealed in his political speeches (November 1914-August 1923)
Mussolini, Benito
Fascism -- Italy; Italy -- Politics and government -- 1914-1945; Mussolini, Benito, 1883-1945; Partito nazionale fascista (Italy)
The much-talked-of republican tendency had to be a kind of attempt at
separation from the many elements which had come to us simply because we
had won. These elements do not please us. These people who always side
with the victor, and who are ready to change their flag with a change of
fortune, must be looked upon with suspicion and carefully watched by the
Fascisti. Is it possible—here is the question—to bring about a profound
transformation in our political régime and to create a new Italy without
touching the monarchic system? What is the general attitude of the
Fascisti as regards political institutions? Our attitude does not commit
us in any sense. In truth, perfect régimes are only to be found in books
of philosophy. I think that it would have been disastrous for the Greek
city if the theories of Plato had been literally applied. A people
content under a republic never dreams of having a king. A people not
accustomed to a republic longs to return to a monarchy.
It was in vain that the Germans tried to make the Phrygian cap fit their
square heads. The Germans hate a republic, and the fact that it was
imposed by the Entente and that it has been a kind of _ersatz_, is
another reason for their hating it. So that, generally speaking,
political forms cannot be approved of or condemned for ever, but must be
examined from the point of view of their direct relation with the
mentality, the economic condition and the spiritual force of any
particular people. (A voice cries: “Long live Mazzini!”)
Now, I think that the régime can be largely modified without interfering
with the monarchy. In reality—and I refer to the cry of my friend—the
same Mazzini, republican and advocate of republicanism, did not consider
his doctrines incompatible with the monarchic aspect of Italian unity.
He resigned himself to it and accepted it. It was not his ideal, but the
ideal cannot always be realised.
We shall, then, leave the monarchic institution outside our field of
action, which will have other great objects, because we think that a
great part of Italy would regard with suspicion a change in the régime
which was carried thus far. We should have regional separatism, perhaps,
because it is always so. To-day there are many indifferent to the
monarchy who to-morrow would be its supporters, and who would find
highly respectable and sentimental reasons for attacking Fascismo, if it
had dared to aim at this target.
I do not think that the monarchy has really any object in opposing what
must now be called the Fascista revolution. It is not in its interests,
because by doing so it would immediately make itself an object of
attack, in which case we could not spare it, because it would be a
question of life or death for us.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account