Communism -- Soviet Union; Goldman, Emma, 1869-1940; Soviet Union -- History -- Revolution, 1917-1921 -- Personal narratives, American
Nor did the sincere Communists realize the disgrace of the
situation--not even Angelica Balabanova. Yet she had good judgment of
character and knew how to appraise the people who flocked to Russia. Her
experience with Mrs. Clare Sheridan was characteristic. The lady had
been smuggled into Russia before Moscow realized that she was the cousin
of Winston Churchill. She was obsessed by the desire “to sculp”
prominent Communists. She had also begged Angelica to sit for her.
“Lenin, Trotsky, and other leaders are going to; aren’t you?” she
pleaded. Angelica, who hated sensationalism in any form, resented the
presence in Russia of these superficial visitors. “I asked her,” she
afterward related, “if she would have thought of ‘sculping’ Lenin three
years ago when the English Government denounced him as a German spy.
Lenin did not make the Revolution. The Russian people made it. I told
this Mrs. Sheridan that she would do better to ‘sculp’ Russian
workingmen and women who were the real heroes of the Revolution. I know
she did not like what I said. But I don’t care. I can’t stand people to
whom the Russian struggle is mere copy for poor imitations or cheap
display.”
Now the new delegates were beginning to arrive. They were royally
welcomed and fêted. They were taken to show schools, children’s homes,
colonies, and model factories. It was the traditional Potemkin
villages[D] that were shown the visitors. They were graciously received
and “talked to” by Lenin and Trotsky, treated to theatres, concerts,
ballets, excursions, and military parades. In short, nothing was left
undone to put the delegates into a frame of mind favourable to the great
plan that was to be revealed to them at the Red Trade Union and the
Third International Congresses. There were also continuous private
conferences where the delegates were subjected to a regular third
degree, Lozovsky--prominent Bolshevik labour leader--and his retinue
seeking to ascertain their attitude to the Third International, the
dictatorship of the proletariat, and similar subjects. Here and there
was a delegate who refused to divulge the instructions of his
organization on the ground that he was pledged to report only to the
Congress. But such naïve people reckoned without their host. They soon
found themselves ostracized and at the Congress they were given no
opportunity to make themselves heard effectively.
The majority of the delegates were more pliable. They learned quickly
that pledges and responsibilities were considered bourgeois
superstitions. To show their ultra-radicalism they quickly divested
themselves of them. They became the echoes of Zinoviev, Lozovsky, and
other leaders.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account