I have said that Jimmy spent much of his time in contributing to various leading waste-paper baskets, and that of an evening he was usually to be found prone on my hearth-rug. When he entered my room he was ever willing to tell us what he thought of editors, but his meerschaum with the cherry-wood stem gradually drove all passion from his breast, and instead of upbraiding more successful men than himself, he then lazily scribbled letters to them on my wall-paper. The wall to the right of the fireplace was thick with these epistles, which seemed to give Jimmy relief, though William John had to scrape and scrub at them next morning with india-rubber. Jimmy's sarcasm--to which that wall-paper can probably still speak--generally took this form: _To G. Buckle, Esq., Columbia Road, Shoreditch_. SIR:--I am requested by Mr. James Moggridge, editor of the _Times_, to return you the inclosed seven manuscripts, and to express his regret that there is at present no vacancy in the sub-editorial department of the _Times_ such as Mr. Buckle kindly offers to fill. Yours faithfully, P. R. (for J. Moggridge, Ed. _Times_). _To Mr. James Knowles, Brick Lane, Spitalfields_. DEAR SIR:--I regret to have to return the inclosed paper, which is not quite suitable for the _Nineteenth Century_. I find that articles by unknown men, however good in themselves, attract little attention. I inclose list of contributors for next month, including, as you will observe, seven members of upper circles, and remain your obedient servant, J. MOGGRIDGE, Ed. _Nineteenth Century_. _To Mr. W Pollock, Mile-End Road, Stepney_. SIR:--I have on two previous occasions begged you to cease sending daily articles to the _Saturday_. Should this continue we shall be reluctantly compelled to take proceedings against you. Why don't you try the _Sporting Times?_ Yours faithfully, J. MOGGRIDGE, Ed. _Saturday Review._ _To Messrs. Sampson, Low & Co., Peabody Buildings, Islington._ DEAR SIRS:--The manuscript which you forwarded for our consideration has received careful attention; but we do not think it would prove a success, and it is therefore returned to you herewith. We do not care to publish third-rate books. We remain yours obediently, J. MOGGRIDGE & CO. (late Sampson, Low & Co.). _To H. Quilter, Esq., P.O. Bethnal Green._ SIR:--I have to return your paper on Universal Art. It is not without merit; but I consider art such an important subject that I mean to deal with it exclusively myself. With thanks for kindly appreciation of my new venture, I am yours faithfully, J. MOGGRIDGE, Ed. _Universal Review._ _To John Morley, Esq., Smith Street, Blackwall._