My Life at Sea: being a "yarn" loosely spun for the purpose of holding together certain reminiscences of the transition period from sail to steam in the British mercantile marine (1863-1894)Crutchley, William Caius
History
My Life at Sea: being a "yarn" loosely spun for the purpose of holding together certain reminiscences of the transition period from sail to steam in the British mercantile marine (1863-1894)
Crutchley, William Caius
Merchant marine -- Great Britain; Seafaring life
Before leaving this subject of Antarctic ice it may be of interest to
note some of its characteristics. Firstly its size. On one occasion
we passed a flat-topped mass which at a distance of fifteen miles
subtended a horizontal arc of twenty-four degrees, and another berg was
passed having in it an arch big enough for a ship to go through. As
nearly as we could compute, the arch was about 270 feet high.
Once, far south by the Nimrod Islands, crossing the great ice-bearing
current, we saw some bergs which were very remarkable inasmuch as they
appeared to be stratified, and when in one position reminded one of
enormous tulips. I embodied the experiences of that trip in a paper
read before the Australian Science Congress, and still hope that the
source of that particular ice-bearing current will be investigated by
one of the Antarctic expeditions.
At the time I first took a ship round Cape Horn the charts left a good
deal to be desired. As an instance of what I mean, Cape Horn itself was
noted as about 500 feet high. From my own observations I was certain
this was not correct, and calling on the Hydrographer, Sir W. Wharton,
K.C.B., one day, I assured him that it was at least 1,200 feet high. He
replied that this was impossible, “for Fitzroy had a station on top of
Cape Horn,” meaning Admiral Fitzroy, who had made the original survey
from which our chart was drawn. This was in 1885, and within a very
few days of this interview I received a letter written by direction
of the Hydrographer thanking me for observations that had enabled him
to correct the lines of variation near Cape Horn, and stating that
the French survey of 1882-3 had fixed the height of that promontory
as 1,394 feet. My observations were afterwards verified by Captain
Clayton, R.N., of H.M.S. _Diamond_, for magnetic observations made
in an iron ship are always regarded with a certain suspicion. I must
say, however, that I always found Sir William Wharton quite willing
and even anxious to receive any information that might be useful, and
the Superintendent of Compasses, Captain Creak, R.N., F.R.S., was most
helpful and encouraging, even to coming on board the _Kaikoura_ and
assisting me to compensate the compass for heeling error. Previous to
this there had always been some mystery as to the so-called vagaries
of ships’ compasses off Cape Horn, the truth being that the variation
lines as shown on the charts were in places as much as five degrees
wrong. It came to my lot to make the correction through my taking
nothing for granted which I could not verify.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account