We were too satisfied with our apparent “friends”; we were, and still
are, much too sure of them! We were comfortable, contented, lazy. We
had everything we wanted and more. We spent money freely, and being
eminently good-natured and trustful, we allowed every one to come in
at our open doors and partake of our hospitality. Out of our full bags
of gold we poured rivers of charity in every direction; we helped
everybody that asked for help; and we allowed all sorts of folk to
exploit us and make money out of us. We could not believe that the
“friends” we entertained and whose hands we had filled with good gifts
could ever turn upon us. We seemed to have no foes; and we trusted
these “friends” of ours implicitly. Too casual and easy-going to heed
the teachings of philosophy we forgot that it takes a far nobler nature
to receive benefits than to bestow them.
Mean minds resent generosity while taking advantage of it, and nothing
goads and envenoms some dispositions so much as the near consciousness
of a superior force and ungrudging hand. This was, and is, the trouble
with the Kaiser and his particular following--we will not say Germany,
for German without the Hohenzollern autocracy would be a very different
and far greater Germany than it has been since the days of Goethe and
Schiller.
The Emperor William, as an eminently theatrical monarch, loving
grease-paint and the limelight, and obsessed by various crazes, such
as hate for his English mother and intensified hate for his mother’s
country, filled even with a morbid revulsion against the English
blood in his own veins, cannot abide the thought of the greatness
and far-reaching protective influence of the British Imperial Power.
To bend, break, and destroy THAT has been his dream from boyhood--a
dream never to be fulfilled! His visits to our shores were the visits
of a seeming “friend,” and we treated him as an honest people treat
an honest man. He took our kindness for stupidity, our trust for
ignorance, our faith for credulity, and his complete misconception of
the British character has led him into a trap which he set for us, but
by which he himself is snared--the usual Nature-law enacted surely and
remorselessly on every treacherous soul.
What would be said or thought of a man invited to the house of a
kindly hostess and permitted to enjoy the full freedom of the place,
its hospitality, its food, its comfort and shelter, who, on having
used it as a convenience and gained personal pleasure and advantage
therein, even to the making of money, suddenly turned roughly upon his
entertainer, abused her manners, her voice, her speech, her friends,
her servants and mode of living, and having got all he wanted out of
her personally insulted her? Probably not one man in ten thousand
would conduct himself so vilely, but if that one man did so forgo all
manliness, there would be not a few of his own sex ready and more than
willing to put him in his place at the point of the boot.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account