So it was settled. I and my friend (a lady who has been my companion
throughout my life since my childhood, and who has generously and
kindly undertaken all my household cares) set happily to work to
preserve our fruit; whole in jars where we could do so, but made into
jam for the most part. I would here remark, with all diffidence, that
I do not revel in jam myself; but I like having it for others--such as
schoolboys, for instance, before whom whole pots vanish like snow in
the sun when they come to tea with me, bless their frank appetites!
We had nearly completed our labours, all except the transmutation of
apples into jelly and “apple cheese” (the best possible substitute
for butter), when one afternoon, while I was out, a police constable
called and said he must search the house for “hoards.” He brought
no authority, but stated that if he were refused he would procure a
search warrant. My friend, who received the intruder, was naturally
rather surprised, but having nothing to hide she cordially invited
the official to go all over the house wherever he would. Accordingly
he tramped into the dining-room, opened cupboards and drawers, even
peering into an unobtrusive little tea-caddy, and went down into
the cellar and inspected the larder. He found nothing but a large
flour-bin, into which for convenience had been put fifteen pounds of
sugar (duly weighed) left for use with the apples yet to be preserved.
While he was still on the prowl, I returned home, and though I am never
much taken aback at anything Stratford-on-Avon “authorities” do, I
was, I think, justifiably annoyed at having my private rooms searched
on such a ridiculous charge of which I was absolutely guiltless.
Moreover, the “hofficer” who had thus broken into my house without
warning, was a man who had often had supper in our kitchen with beer
_galore_, which he had greatly relished--while another detail of the
matter was that for some years, since the intrusion of an unhappy
lunatic-tramp into my garden, the police had been given by myself a
private key to the premises, so that they could enter at any time.
Therefore, if they had sought to keep me under “observation” there was
nothing to hinder their surveillance, which indeed I had personally
requested and was grateful for. But--as the official informed me the
“hoarding” accusation came “from London”--“on account of Sir Thomas
Lipton.” This rather amazed me, and for a moment I thought it must be
that “feather in the Angel-Wing”! My doubts were soon set at rest by
a visit from my solicitor who told me Sir Thomas was “much distressed
and could not sleep” for thinking about the threatened trouble. Some
one at certain Stratford-on-Avon Stores had noted the arrival at the
railway station of the Lipton supplies of sugar--quite openly sent,
and openly marked “Sugar,” for we were under the impression that all
was in due observance of the Food Production rules, and that there was
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account