Yet more: men who, in their turn, write letters to the descendant
of Louis XIV., in order to stop the heretics, corrupters of morals,
abominable men of the nineteenth century from having their works
played, grovel on their knees before the illustrious dead; they search
his works for the slenderest motives he might have had or did not
have, in writing them; they poke about to discover what he could have
meant by such and such a thing, when he was merely giving to the world
the fruits of such inspiration as only genius possesses; they even
indulge in profound researches concerning the man who furnished the
type for _Tartuffe_ and into the circumstances which gave him the name
of _Tartuffe_ (so admirably appropriate to that personage, that it has
become not only the name of a man, but the name of _men._)
"We have pointed out where Molière got his model; it now
remains to us to discuss the origin of the title of his
play. To trace the derivation of a word might seem going
into unnecessary detail in any other case; _but nothing
which concerns the masterpiece of our stage should be
devoid of interest._ Several commentators, among others
Bret, have contended that Molière, busy over the work he
was meditating, one day happened to be at the house of the
Papal Nuncio where many saintly persons were gathered. A
truffle-seller came to the door and the smell of his wares
wafted in, whereupon the sanctimonious contrite expression
on the faces of the courtiers of the ambassador of Rome lit
up with animation, 'TARTUFOLI, _Signor Nunzio!_ TARTUFOLI!'
they exclaimed, pointing out the best to him. According to
this version, it was the word _tartufoli_, pronounced with
earthly sensuality by the lips of mystics, which suggested
to Molière the name of his impostor. We were the first to
dispute that fable and we quote below the opinion of one
of the most distinguished of literary men, who did us the
honour of adopting our opinion.
"In the time of Molière, the word _truffer_ was generally
used for tromper (_i.e._ to deceive), from which the word
_truffe_ was taken, a word eminently suitable to the kind of
eatable it describes, because of the difficulty there is in
finding it. Now, it is quite certain that, formerly, people
used the words _truffe_ and _tartuffe_ indiscriminately,
for we find it in an old French translation of the treatise
by Platina, entitled _De konestâ voluptate_, printed in
Paris in 1505, and quoted by le Duchat, in his edition of
Méntage's _Dictionnaire Étymologique._ One of the chapters
in Book IX. of this treatise is entitled, _Des truffes ou
tartuffes_, and as le Duchat and other etymologists look
upon the word _truffe_ as derived from _truffer_, it is
probable that people said _tartuffe_ for _truffe_ in the
fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, just as they could
equally say _tartuffer_ for _truffer_."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account