Detective and mystery stories; England -- Fiction; Murder -- Investigation -- Fiction
The problem of Staveley's death was a piece of the puzzle which
defeated all Wendover's attempts to fit it into place. Who had an
interest in removing Staveley? The Fleetwoods, according to the
inspector's ideas; and Wendover could not help admitting that a jury
might look at things from the inspector's point of view. Undoubtedly
he himself had produced enough circumstantial evidence to clear
Cressida of even a manslaughter charge, provided that one pinned the
prosecution down to the period when she met Staveley on the rock; but
Wendover had been thoroughly alarmed by Sir Clinton's instructions to
Armadale; and he feared that he had missed some vital link in the
chain of evidence which might overturn his whole case for the defence.
Then there was the alternative hypothesis: that Mme.
Laurent-Desrousseaux had been the one to shoot Staveley. Again there
seemed to be the double solution open, with no way of deciding which
answer to choose. And, to make the matter still more complex, there
was the second cartridge-case found at the groyne, which Stanley
Fleetwood denied having used. Finally, Sir Clinton most obviously
expected to find yet another empty cartridge-case somewhere on the
sands. Wendover gave it up. Then a fresh thought struck him. Staveley,
as the inspector had hinted, would be a good witness for the claimant;
and therefore, making the same assumptions as before, Paul
Fordingbridge had an interest in silencing him. But there was no
evidence connecting Paul Fordingbridge with the matter at all. That
seemed to be a blank end, like all the others.
The next link in the chain of events was the attack on Cargill. The
more Wendover considered the matter, the clearer it seemed to him that
Cargill had been shot in mistake for the claimant. The two men were
very much alike, except for the awful mutilation of the claimant's
face; and, of course, that would not show in the dark. Once the
claimant was out of the way, then Paul Fordingbridge would be free
from the impending disclosure of his malversations, if these had
really occurred.
And, suddenly, a light flashed on Wendover's mind from a fresh angle.
The claimant, Cressida, Paul Fordingbridge—that was the order of
inheritance. If by some manœuvre Paul Fordingbridge could clear out of
his way, not the claimant only, but his niece as well, then he himself
would come into the estate, and no one could ask any questions
whatever. Cressida had been twice involved—once in the affair of
Staveley; again when her car came up just after Cargill had been shot.
Was it possible that Paul Fordingbridge had tried to kill two birds
with one stone in the last crime? The inspector would have been a
willing tool in his hands, since he believed Cressida quite capable of
murder.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account