Detective and mystery stories; England -- Fiction; Murder -- Investigation -- Fiction
“Peter Hay, I suspect, they fastened on as being the most dangerous
witness. Probably Aird made an appointment for the claimant, and they
called at the poor old chap's cottage at night. He evidently refused
to have anything to do with them; and he was too dangerous to leave
alive; so they killed him. Then they went after the diary—probably
Aird knew about that, or else Peter may have let the information out
somehow—and they took Hay's keys to get into Foxhills. The silver
plant was an obvious muddle. They hadn't Cargill at the back of them
at the time, and they made that mistake on the spur of the moment.
“By that time they'd got in touch with Miss Fordingbridge. Aird would
know all about her spiritualistic leanings, and they played on that
string. But soon they learned they were up against Paul Fordingbridge;
and they began to see that it would be easiest to put him out of their
road.
“Meanwhile Staveley took it into his head to work on his own by trying
to blackmail the Fleetwoods. And you know what came of that. The rest
of the gang thought they could kill two birds with one stone—at least,
the gang minus Billingford, for really I don't think Billingford was
much more than a tool.
“Now, inspector, how far does that square with all the confidences you
extracted last night from that precious pair of scoundrels? Do I get a
box of chocolates or only a clay pipe in this competition?”
The inspector made no attempt to suppress the admiration in his tone.
“It's wonderfully accurate, sir. You're right on every point of
importance—even down to what happened in the war.”
“That's a relief,” the chief constable admitted with a laugh. “I was
rather afraid that I'd
. . . Summed it so well that it came to far more
Than the witnesses ever had said!
And now I think I'll go back to the hotel and try to make my peace
with the Fleetwoods. I like them, and I'd hate to leave a false
impression of my character on their minds. Care to come along,
squire?”
The End
Transcriber’s Note
This transcription follows the text of the Grosset & Dunlap edition
published in 1928. The following alterations have been made to correct
what are believed to be unambiguous printer's errors.
* “Laurent-Desrousseux” has been changed to “Laurent-Desrousseaux”
(Ch. XI).
* “tha” has been changed to “that” (Ch. XI).
* “Stavely” has been changed to “Staveley” (Ch. XVII).
* “coudn't” has been changed to “couldn't” (Ch. XVII).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account