Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
It is thus only natural that one and the same man should have two
modes of knowing. Judging by the facts of the senses, he is a thing
among other things, and, in so far as he is that, he gains for himself
a knowledge of these things; but at any moment he can acquire the
higher experience that he is really the form in which the All-Being
beholds Itself. Then man transforms himself from a thing among other
things into a form of the All-Being--and, along with himself, the
knowledge of things transforms itself into the expression of the very
being of things. But as a matter of fact this transformation can only
be accomplished through man. That which is mediated in the higher
knowledge does not exist as long as this higher knowledge itself is not
present. Man becomes only a real being in the creation of this higher
knowledge; and only through man’s higher knowledge can things also
bring their being forth into real existence.
If, therefore, we demand that man shall add nothing to things through
his inner knowledge, but merely give expression to whatever already
exists in the things outside of himself, that would really amount to a
complete abnegation of all higher knowledge. From the fact that man,
in respect of his sensible life, is merely one thing among others,
and that he only attains to the higher knowledge when he himself
accomplishes with himself, as a being of the senses, the transformation
into a higher being, it follows that he can never replace the one
kind of knowledge by the other. His spiritual life consists, on the
contrary, in a ceaseless oscillation between these two poles of
knowledge--between knowing and seeing. If he shuts himself off from
the seeing, he abandons the real nature of things: if he seeks to shut
himself off from sense-perception, he would shut out from himself the
things whose nature he seeks to know. It is these very same things
which reveal themselves alike in the lower knowing and the higher
seeing; only in the one case they reveal themselves according to their
outer appearance; in the other according to their inner being. Thus
it is not due to the things themselves that, at a certain stage, they
appear only as external things; but their doing so is due to the fact
that man must first of all raise and transform himself to the level
upon which the things cease to be external and outside.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account