Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
The views which Agrippa develops about the world, and the relation of
man to the world, present themselves to us in the case of Theophrastus
Paracelsus, in a similar manner, only in more perfected form. It is
better, therefore, to consider them in connection with the latter.
Paracelsus characterises himself aptly, when he writes under his
portrait: “None shall be another’s slave, who for himself can remain
alone.” His whole attitude towards knowledge is given in these words.
He strives everywhere to go back himself to the deepest foundations
of natural knowledge, in order to rise by his own strength to the
loftiest regions of cognition. As Physician, he will not, like his
contemporaries, simply accept what the ancient investigators, who then
counted as authorities,--Galen or Avicenna, for instance, asserted
long ago; he is resolved to read for himself directly in the book of
Nature. “The Physician must pass Nature’s examination, which is the
world, and all its origins. And the very same that Nature teaches him,
he must command to his wisdom, but seek for nothing in his wisdom, only
and alone in the light of Nature.” He shrinks from nothing, in order
to learn to know Nature and her workings in all directions. For this
purpose he made journeys to Sweden, Hungary, Spain, Portugal, and the
East. He can truly say of himself: “I have followed the Art at the
risk of my life, and have not been ashamed to learn from wanderers,
executioners and sheep-shearers. My doctrine was tested more severely
than silver in poverty, fears, wars and hardships.”
What has been handed down by ancient authorities has for him no value,
for he believes that he can attain to the right view only if he
himself experiences the upward climb from the knowledge of Nature to
the highest insight. This living, personal experience puts into his
mouth the proud utterance: “He who will follow truth, must come into
my monarchy.... After me; not I after you, Avicenna, Rhases, Galen,
Mesur! After me; not I after you, O ye of Paris, ye of Montpellier, ye
of Swabia, ye of Meissen, ye of Cologne, ye of Vienna and of what lies
on the Danube and the Rhine; ye islands in the sea, thou Italy, thou
Dalmatia, thou Athens, thou Greek, thou Arab, thou Israelite; after me,
not I after you! Mine is the Monarchy.”
It is easy to misunderstand Paracelsus because of his rough exterior,
which sometimes conceals a deep earnestness behind a jest. Does he
not himself say: “By nature I am not subtly woven, nor brought up on
figs and wheat-bread, but on cheese, milk and rye-bread, wherefore I
may well be rude with the over-clean and superfine; for those who were
brought up in soft clothing and we who were bred in pine needles do not
easily understand one another. When in myself I mean to be kindly, I
must therefore often be taken as rude. How can I not be strange to one
who has never wandered in the sun?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account