| | | Ziklag: xv. 30; xix. | iv. 30 | | | 4. Robinson (II. 181) | | | | identifies the pass | | | | es Sŭfa with Zephath | | | | (Sheet 21.) S’baita, | | | | south of Beersheba | | | | (Sheet 20) is also | | | | proposed and has many | | | | supporters. The name | | | | Kh. Hôra (Sheet 13) | | | | east of Beersheba, | | | | exists at a very | | | | ancient site. (_Mem._ | | | | III. 396; Sh. XXIV.) | | | | S’beita does not | | | | represent the Hebrew, | | | | which is correctly | | | | rendered by Sŭfa, as | | | | Robinson proposes. | | | | =HORONAIM= |Is. xv. 5; |_Not |-- |Possibly ‘Wâdy Ghûeir’ | Jer. xlviii. | identified_ | | (with ancient road). | 3, 5, 34 | | | The Hebrew and Arabic | | | | have the same meaning, | | | | with a slight change | | | | of guttural. (Conder, | | | | _Heth and Moab_, 403) | | | | situated between ‘Beth | | | | Jesimoth’ (Sheet 14) | | | | and ‘Luhith’ (Sheet | | | | 15.) | | | | =HOSAH= |Josh. xix. 29 |_ʾEzzîyat el | 6 |A city of Asher. | | Fôka_ or _et | | Probably the present | | Tahta_ (?)* | | ruins now called | | | | ‘ʾEzzîyat el Fôka,’ | | | | south of Tyre. (_Mem._ | | | | I. 48, 51; Sh. | | | | I.)--Conder. | | | | =HUKKOK= |Josh. xix. 34 |_Yakûk_ | 6 |Named next to ‘Aznoth | | | | Tabor’ as being on the