Names and places in the Old and New Testament and Apocrypha, with their modern identifications
Religion
Names and places in the Old and New Testament and Apocrypha, with their modern identifications
Bible -- Geography; Names in the Bible; Names, Geographical
| | | | Statement_, p. 9;
| | | | Conder’s _Heth &
| | | | Moab_, p. 130.)
| | | |
=ZORAH= |Josh. xix. |_Surʾah_ |14 |In Neh. xi. 29 Zareah;
| 41; Judg. | | | Joshua xv. 33 Zoreah.
| xiii. 2, 25; | | | A town of Dan. Now
| xvi. 31; | | | the village ‘Surʾah,’
| xviii. 2, | | | on the north side
| 11; 2 Chr. | | | of the Valley of
| xi. 10 | | | Sorek, opposite ‘Beth
| | | | Shemesh.’ One of the
| | | | fenced cities of
| | | | Rehoboam. (_Mem._ III.
| | | | 158; Sh. XVII.)
| | | |
=ZUPH=, The |1 Sam. ix. 5 |_Not |-- |This name has not been
Land of | | identified_ | | recovered. (_See_
| | | | Conder’s _Primer of
| | | | Bible Geography_, p.
| | | | 91.) It is thought by
| | | | some to be personal
| | | | (see 1 Sam. i. 1.)
| | | |
----------------+--------------+--------------+---+-----------------------
THE END.
BILLING AND SONS, PRINTERS, GUILDFORD.
NEW TESTAMENT SITES.
In the column ‘Modern Identification,’ those marked with a single ? are
doubtful; those with double ?? are very doubtful; those marked with a star
are due to the Survey. In the column of Remarks the letters ‘Mem. II.
387; Sh. IV.’ refer to the _Memoirs of the Survey of Palestine_, with the
Volume, Page, and Sheet of the _Great Map_. The letters Q. S., _Quarterly
Statement_; O. T. S., _Old Testament Sites_; Grove’s B. I., _Bible Index_;
Smith’s D. of B., _Dictionary of the Bible_; Jer. Vol., _Jerusalem Volume_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account