The earliest of these editions is usually thought to be one _Alberic’ vespucci’ laurētio petri francisci de medicis Salutem plurimā dicit_, of which a fac-simile of the title is annexed, and which bears the imprint of Jehan Lambert.[507] It is a small plaquette of six leaves; and there are copies in the Lenox and Carter-Brown collections. D’Avezac, and Harrisse, in his later opinion (_Additions_, p. 19), agree in supposing this the first edition. The dated (1504) Augsburg edition, _Mundus novus_, is called “extraordinarily rare” by Grenville, who had a copy, now in the British Museum. On the reverse of the fourth and last leaf we read: “Magister Johānes otmar: vindelice impressit Auguste Anno millesimo quingentesimo quarto.” There are copies in the Lenox and Carter-Brown libraries.[508] An edition, _Mundus novus_, whose four unnumbered leaves, forty lines to the full page, correspond wholly with this last issue, except that for the dated colophon the words LAUS DEO are substituted, was put at first by Harrisse[509] at the head of the list, with this title. There is a copy in the Lenox Library, which has another issue, _Mundus novus_, also in black-letter, forty-two lines to the page;[510] still another, _Mundus novus_, forty lines to the page;[511] and another, with the words _Mundus novus_ in Roman, of eight leaves, thirty lines to the page.[512] At this point in his enumeration Harrisse placed originally the Jehan Lambert issue (mentioned above), and after it a _Mundus novus_ printed in Paris by Denys Roce, of which only a fragment (five leaves) exists, sold in the Libri sale in London, 1865, and now in the British Museum.[513] Another Paris edition, _Mundus novus_, printed by Gilles de Gourmont, eight leaves, thirty-one lines to the page, is, according to Harrisse,[514] known only in a copy in the Lenox Library; but D’Avezac refers to a copy in the National Library in Paris.[515] [Illustration: FIRST PAGE OF MUNDUS NOVUS. Harrisse, no. 29. Cf. Navarrete, _Opúsculos_ i. 99.]