The map accompanying this tract, engraved by W. Hole, appeared in three impressions (Stevens’s _Bibliotheca Historica_, 1870, no. 1,903). It was altered somewhat, and the words, “Page 41, Smith,” were put in the lower right-hand corner, when it was next used in the _Generall Historie_, 1624 and later; and in 1625 it was again inserted at pp. 1836-37 of Purchas’s _Pilgrimes_, vol. iv. De Bry next re-engraved it in part xiii. of his _Great Voyages_, printed in German, 1627, and in Latin 1634; and in part xiv. in German in 1630 (_Carter-Brown Catalogue_, i. 370-71). It was also re-engraved for Gottfriedt’s _Newe Welt_, published at Frankfort, and marked “Erforshet und beschriben durch Capitain Iohan Schmidt.” The compiler of this last book was J. Ph. Abelin, who had been one of De Bry’s co-workers, and he made this work in some sort an abridgment of De Bry’s, use being made of his plates, often inserting them in the text, the book being first issued in 1631, and again in 1655. (Muller’s _Books on America_, 1872, no. 636, and (1877) no. 1,269.) The map was next used in two English editions of Hondy’s _Mercator_, “Englished by W. S.” 1635, etc., but with some fanciful additions, as Mr. Deane says (Bohn’s _Lowndes_, p. 1103). The map of the coast in De Laet, 1633 and 1640, was, it would seem, founded upon it for the Chesapeake region; cf. also the map of Virginia and Florida called “par Mercator,” of date 1633, and the maps by Blaeu, of 1655 and 1696. Once more Smith’s plot adorned, in 1671, Ogilby’s large folio on _America_, p. 193, as it had also found place in the prototype of Ogilby, the Amsterdam Montanus of 1671 and 1673. In these two books (1671-73) also appeared the map “Virginiæ, partis australis et Floridæ, partis orientalis, nova descriptio,” which shows the coast from the Chesapeake down to the 30th degree of north latitude. Smith’s was finally substantially copied as late as 1735, as the best available source, in _A Short Account of the First Settlement of the Provinces_, etc., London, 1735,—a contribution to the literature of the boundary dispute, and was doubtless the basis of the map in Keith’s _Virginia_ in 1738; but it finally gave place to Fry and Jefferson’s map of the region in 1750.