After the plan in Leake's _Life of Lamb_, p. 176. The legend in northwest corner of the map reads by error "Halt of the _right_ [should be _left_] column." Other eclectic maps are given in Sparks's _Washington_, v. 92; in Boynton's _West Point_; and in Carrington's _Battles_, p. 362.] Lord George Germain, or, as some have thought, Sir John Dalrymple, published a _Reply to Lieutenant-General Burgoyne's letter to his constituents_[876] (London, 1779), pronouncing it a libel upon the king's government, and this was seconded by an anonymous _Letter to Lieutenant-General Burgoyne on his letter to his constituents_ (London, 1779).[877] The further controversy over Burgoyne's failure includes the following publications:— _A brief examination of the plan and conduct of the Northern expedition in America in 1777, and of the surrender of the army under the command of Lieutenant-General Burgoyne_ (London, 1779),—a severe attack.[878] _An Enquiry into and remarks upon the Conduct of Lieutenant-General Burgoyne; the plan of operations for the campaign of 1777; the instructions from the Secretary of State, and the circumstances that led to the loss of the northern army_ (London, 1780).[879] _Essay on modern martyrs, with a letter to General Burgoyne_ (London, 1780),[880]—charging him with being the personal cause of his own misfortunes. In addition, there were some publications reviewing the conduct of Howe's as well as Burgoyne's campaigns in 1777, which will be noticed in another place. Burgoyne's main defence against all these charges appeared in his _A State of the Expedition from Canada as laid before the House of Commons, with a collection of Authentic Documents, and an addition of many circumstances which were prevented from appearing before the House by the Prorogation of Parliament, written and collated by himself, with plans_ (London, 1780).[881] In his introduction Burgoyne says, that, being denied a professional examination of his conduct, and disappointed in a parliamentary one, he was induced to make this publication.[882] This publication was followed by _A Supplement to the State of the Expedition from Canada, containing Gen. Burgoyne's Orders respecting the Principal Movements and Operations of the Army to the Raising of the Siege of Ticonderoga_ (London, 1780).[883] Burgoyne was attacked in return in the following: _Remarks on General Burgoyne's State of the Expedition from Canada_ (London, 1780),[884] being a defence of the ministry, and holding that Burgoyne had forfeited all claims to pity. _A letter to Lieutenant-General Burgoyne occasioned by a second edition of his State of the Expedition, etc._ (London, 1780).[885] Fonblanque (ch. viii.) portrays the effect in England of the parliamentary inquiry. Cf. Macknight's _Burke_ (ch. 30). The Rev. Samuel Peters' reply to Burgoyne in the Appendix of Jones's _New York during the Revolutionary War_ (vol. i. p. 683).