Narrative of the Fenian invasion of CanadaSomerville, Alexander
History
Narrative of the Fenian invasion of Canada
Somerville, Alexander
Canada -- History -- Fenian Invasions, 1866-1870
“To ask by the logic of political affinities, that all loyal
subjects who can appreciate the freedom and stability of Britain,
should extend a lively sympathy to the United States, now
struggling in the majesty of a grand conservatism to consolidate
civil and religious liberty with an enduring nationality; a
result, which only Britain, of all other nations in the world,
has practically achieved. To treat of those things; to contribute
to the safety of Canada, and like a drop added to the mighty
St. Lawrence, river of the life of North America, to contribute
my driblet to the well-being of the British empire, and to the
happiness of peaceful nations. That is the object of the work now
in the reader’s hand.”
BATTLE OF BULL’S RUN. That was still a topic of popular conversation
when “Canada a Battle Ground” was written. Of that, it was remarked;
p. 59,
“It would have been to the advantage of international amity if Mr.
Russell of the _Times_ had seen and described the actual battle of
Manassas _alias_ Bull’s Run, which, while it lasted, was a valiant
conflict, carried on by troops, on the Government side, _famishing
for want of water and food, and unsupported by the necessary
adjuncts of a campaign, all difficulties caused by a too early
advance without the means of transport, and all aggravated by the
battle occurring in a thickly wooded country_. Killed and wounded
at Bull Run, 18 per cent of all engaged, in five hours. Killed and
wounded at Waterloo, in the year 1815, 24 per cent of all engaged
of British and Allies, in twelve hours. The defeated veterans ran
six times farther from Waterloo, than the defeated troops at Bull
Run.”
“TRUTHS ABOUT BATTLES—WELLINGTON AND WATERLOO. Even Generals in
command can only make a guess at the incidents of battle. Civilian
correspondents, viewing the smoke from afar, can tell nothing
but by hearsay. Nor do Generals find it desirable to publish all
occurrences in their dispatches. A historian having applied to
Wellington for a full account of Waterloo, that he might exactly
describe it, the great General replied as follows:—“You cannot
write a true history of the battle without including the faults and
misbehavior of part of those who were engaged, _and whose faults
and misbehaviour were the cause of material losses. Believe me,
that every man you see in a military uniform is not a hero_; and
that although in the account given of a general action, such as
that of Waterloo, many instances of individual heroism must be
passed over unrelated, it is better for the general interests to
leave those parts of the story untold than to tell the whole truth.
WELLINGTON.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account