Natural history, lore and legend : $b Being some few examples of quaint and by-gone beliefs gathered in from divers authorities, ancient and mediæval, of varying degrees of reliabilityHulme, F. Edward (Frederick Edward)
History
Natural history, lore and legend : $b Being some few examples of quaint and by-gone beliefs gathered in from divers authorities, ancient and mediæval, of varying degrees of reliability
Hulme, F. Edward (Frederick Edward)
Animals, Mythical; Monsters; Science -- History; Zoology -- History
Shakespeare frequently refers to the mythical bird in his writings, and
seems to have thoroughly mastered all that could be said on the subject.
Some half-dozen passages naturally rise to one’s mind as illustrations of
this: thus Rosalind says in As You Like It:—
“She calls me proud; and that she could not love me,
Were man as rare as Phœnix.”
And the idea of its unique character is again brought out in Cymbeline,
in the passage “If she be furnished with a mind so rare, she is alone the
Arabian bird.” The destruction of the bird on its own funeral pyre, and
the resurrection of its successor therefrom, are several times referred
to. Thus in 1 Henry VI. we read: “But from their ashes shall be reared
a Phœnix that shall make all France afeared,” and in 3 Henry VI.: “My
ashes, as the Phœnix, may bring forth a bird that will revenge upon you
all.” Some little doubt of its existence at all is suggested by the
words of Sebastian in the Tempest. Now I will believe
“That there are unicorns: that in Arabia
There is one tree, the Phœnix throne; one Phœnix
At this time reigning there.”
Notwithstanding the doubts as to the reality of this creature that were
freely expressed in the seventeenth century, two feathers that were
said to be from the tail of a Phœnix were amongst the treasures of
Tradescant’s Museum.[73]
It was held a firm article of belief during the Middle Ages that the Bird
of Paradise fed upon nothing more gross than the dew of Heaven and the
odours of flowers, and that it had no feet, nor ever rested on earth at
all.
“Thou art still that Bird of Paradise
Which hath no feet, and ever nobly flies.”
It is a sadly prosaic explanation of this to recall that its footless
condition simply arose from the fact that the natives of Molucca in
sending the skins to Europe removed the legs and feet as needless
additions, seeing that the beauty of the plumage was the reason for their
export.
Tavernier relates that “the Birds of Paradise come in flocks during the
nutmeg season to the South of India. The strength of the nutmeg odour
intoxicates them, and while they lie in this state on the earth, the
ants eat off their legs.” Saving the last terrible detail and shocking
instance of what may befall those who stray from the paths of temperance,
Moore evidently adopts this account in Lalla Rookh in the lines:—
“Those golden birds that in the spicetime drop
About the gardens, drunk with that sweet fruit
Whose scent hath lured them o’er the summer flood.”
Literary allusions to the Bird of Paradise are not unfrequent, and
testify to the general acceptance of the myth that has grown up around
the prosaic facts of the case. Francis Thynne, in his “Emblemes and
Epigrames,” A.D. 1600, takes the somewhat exceptional view that the bird
is to be pitied:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account