Natural history, lore and legend : $b Being some few examples of quaint and by-gone beliefs gathered in from divers authorities, ancient and mediæval, of varying degrees of reliabilityHulme, F. Edward (Frederick Edward)
History
Natural history, lore and legend : $b Being some few examples of quaint and by-gone beliefs gathered in from divers authorities, ancient and mediæval, of varying degrees of reliability
Hulme, F. Edward (Frederick Edward)
Animals, Mythical; Monsters; Science -- History; Zoology -- History
“That tolls
The sick man’s passport in her hollow beak,
And in the shadow of the silent night
Doth shake contagion from her sable wings.”
The whole field of literature teems with references of the same ominous
character. It will suffice to add but one more illustration, where Gay,
in “The Dirge,” notices the evil presage in the lines—
“The boding raven on her cottage sat,
And with hoarse croakings warned us of our fate.”
The raven is sometimes called the devil’s bird. It is believed that
it was originally white, but that it was changed to black for its
disobedience. What this disobedience was appears to be a very moot point.
The old Greeks believed that Apollo once sent it to a fountain to fetch
water, and the bird on arrival found a fig-tree with very nearly ripe
fruit, and determined to wait until they were quite so. As this was a
matter of some few days, it became necessary to invent some plausible
explanation of the delay, so he took a water-snake out of the fountain
and brought it in the pitcher to the god, and explained that this
creature had drunk the reservoir dry. Apollo, declining to accept this
explanation, turned the disobedient raven black, condemned it to be
always plagued with thirst, and changed its once melodious voice into the
monstrous croak[93] that it has ever since been uttering as token of its
punishment. Mediæval writers do not accept this story at all, but declare
that the real reason that the raven exchanged its snow-white plumage for
the sable garb was the consequence of its disobedience when, instead of
returning to the ark to Noah, it stayed to feed on the bodies of the
drowned.[94] It will be seen that in each case disobedience was the
offence, and appetite the occasion thereof.
It is rather startling after this to read in the quaint pages of Legh
that “the Rauen delighteth so much in her owne bewty that when her birds
are hatched she will giue them no meate vntill she see whether they will
bee of her owne colour or no.” Guillim, another writer, like Legh,
on matters heraldic, entirely supports this statement, declaring that
“it hath bene an ancient received opinion, and the same also grounded
vpon the warrant of the Holy Scriptures that such is the property of
the Raven, that from the time his young ones are hatched or disclosed,
untill he seeth what colour they will be of, he never careth of them nor
ministereth any food unto them, therefore it is thought that they are
in the meane space nourished with the heavenly dew. And so muche also
doth the kingly prophet, David, affirme, ‘which giveth fodder unto the
catell and feedeth the young Ravens that call upon him.’ The Raven is of
colour blacke, and when he perceiveth his young ones to be pennefeathered
and black like himself, then doth he labour by all means to foster and
cherish them from thence forward.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account