Natural history, lore and legend : $b Being some few examples of quaint and by-gone beliefs gathered in from divers authorities, ancient and mediæval, of varying degrees of reliabilityHulme, F. Edward (Frederick Edward)
History
Natural history, lore and legend : $b Being some few examples of quaint and by-gone beliefs gathered in from divers authorities, ancient and mediæval, of varying degrees of reliability
Hulme, F. Edward (Frederick Edward)
Animals, Mythical; Monsters; Science -- History; Zoology -- History
“The Lyon,” says Ferne, in his “Blazon of Gentrie, 1586,” “is the most
worthiest of all beastes; yea, he standeth as the king, and is feared
above all the beastes of the fielde. So that by the Lyon is signified
principallitie, dominion, and rule. Fortitude and magnanimity is denoted
in the Lyon.” Coats, another heraldic authority of somewhat later date,
affirms that “the lion is the most magnanimous, the most generous, the
most bold and fierce of all the four-footed race, and therefore he
has been chosen to represent the greatest heroes. This noble creature
represents also Command and Monarchical Dominion, as likewise the
Magnanimity of Majesty, at once exercising Awe and Clemency, subduing
those that resist, and sparing those that humble themselves.” In the
“Indice Armorial” of Geliot, published in Paris in the year 1635, we
read: “Si ca est auec raison que les anciens ont donné a l’aigle la
qualité de Roy des oyseaux et au dauphin celuy des poissons, il y a plus
de sujet de qualifier du nom de Roy le lyon, non seulement pour estre
plus fort et le plus genereux des animaux terrestres, mais principalement
à cause des qualitez royales qui sont en luy. Le lyon ne dort iamais, ou
bien s’il dort c’est auec si peu de repos qu’il ne laisse pas d’auoir les
yeux ouverts. C’est ce que l’on remarque de genereux au lyon que iamais
il n’offence ceux qui s’humilient deuant luy, qu’il ne touche point aux
petits enfants et porta qu’entre les hommes et les femmes il s’addresse
plutost aux hommes, et entre ceux qui les prouoquent il choisira
tousiours celuy qui l’aura blessé, comme mespriant les autres.” Guillim,
in his “Display of Heraldry,” a most popular book, running through many
editions, scarcely gives so exalted an idea of the king of beasts,
since he tells us that “the lion, when he mindeth to assail his enemy,
stirreth up himself by often beating of his back and sides with his tail,
and thereby stirreth up his courage to the end to do nothing faintly
or cowardly. The lion, when he is hunted, carefully provideth for his
safety, labouring to frustrate the pursuit of the hunters by sweeping out
his footsteps with his tail as he goeth, that no appearance of his track
may be discovered. When he hunteth after his prey he roareth vehemently,
whereat the beasts, being astonished, do make a stand, while he with his
tail makes a circuit around them in the sand, which circle they dare
not transgress, which done, out of them he maketh choice of prey at his
leisure.” Thus the lion’s tail is at once a stimulus to valour, an aid
to concealment when the valour has oozed away, and a ring-fence for the
enclosure of his prey.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account