Natural history, lore and legend : $b Being some few examples of quaint and by-gone beliefs gathered in from divers authorities, ancient and mediæval, of varying degrees of reliabilityHulme, F. Edward (Frederick Edward)
History
Natural history, lore and legend : $b Being some few examples of quaint and by-gone beliefs gathered in from divers authorities, ancient and mediæval, of varying degrees of reliability
Hulme, F. Edward (Frederick Edward)
Animals, Mythical; Monsters; Science -- History; Zoology -- History
An old heraldic author tells us “how that the wolfe procureth all other
beasts to fight and contention. He seeketh to deuour the sheepe, that
beaste which is of all others the most hurtlesse, simple, and void of
guile, thirsting continually after their blood. Yea, Nature hath planted
so inveterate an hatred atweene the wolfe and the sheepe, that being
dead, yet in the secrete operation of nature appeareth there a sufficient
trial of their discording natures, so that the enimity betweene them
seemeth not to dye with their bodies; for if there be put vpon a harp
or any such like instrument strings made of the intrailles of a sheepe,
and amongst them but onely one made of the intraills of a wolfe, be the
musician never so cuning in his skil, yet can he not reconcile them to an
vnity and concorde of sounds, so discording alwayes is that string of the
wolfe.” The inveterate enmity between the two creatures is scarcely in
accordance with the facts, for the wolf, from its appreciation of mutton
as an article of diet, is really partial to the sheep, and is always glad
to make its acquaintance.
Another old herald tells us that “the wolfe loveth to plaie with a
child, and will not hurt it till it be extreme hungrie, what time he
will not spare to devour it.” He dwells also upon some of the animal’s
prejudices, as that “he watcheth much, and feareth fier and stones to be
wherled at him,” a feeling that one finds no difficulty in sympathizing
with, and adds that “there is nothing that he hateth so much as the
knocking togither of two flint stones, the which he feareth more than the
hunters.” He also mentions the curious physiological fact that “the wolf
may not bend his neck backward in no moneth of the yere but in May,” but
gives us no inkling as to the reason for this.
The wearing of wolf-skin was held to be a valuable preservative against
epilepsy, but those who were unable to procure this, found an equally
serviceable remedy in wearing a small portion of an ass’s hoof in a
ring. The wolf-skin coat also was in request as a preservative against
hydrophobia, and there was nothing better in the good old times than
a wolfs head under the pillow to secure a good night’s rest. Albertus
Magnus, in his work “De Virtutibus Herbarum,” tells us that if we wrap
the tooth of a wolf in a bay leaf and carry it about with us no one will
have the power to vex or annoy us.
According to Porta—and he, we have seen, professes to have gone into the
secrets of nature as deeply as most men who pose as authorities[53]—the
rook is killed by eating “the reliques of flesh the wolf hath fed on.”
This would appear to be a discovery of Porta’s own: we do not find any
suggestion of it, so far as we are aware, in any other author.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account