Natural History of Cottonmouth Moccasin, Agkistrodon piscovorus (Reptilia)Burkett, Ray D.
Science
Natural History of Cottonmouth Moccasin, Agkistrodon piscovorus (Reptilia)
Burkett, Ray D.
Agkistrodon piscivorus; Snakes
Numerous experiments have been conducted to determine the susceptibility
of various snakes to venom. The majority of these experiments were
performed to learn whether or not venomous snakes were immune to their
own poison. Conant (1934:382) reported on a 30-inch cottonmouth that
killed two Pacific rattlesnakes and another cottonmouth. One rattlesnake
was bitten on the tail and the other on or near the head and partially
swallowed. Gloyd (1933:13-14) recorded fatal effects to a rattlesnake
from the bite of a cottonmouth. He also reported on the observations of
three other crotalids bitten by themselves or other snakes, from which
no harmful effects were observed. Allen (1937) injected several snakes
with dried cottonmouth venom which was diluted with distilled water just
before each injection. Four cottonmouths receiving 9, 18, 19, and 20
milligrams of venom per ounce of body weight survived, while another
receiving 18.7 milligrams per ounce died after three hours. A specimen
of _S. miliarius_ receiving 8.3 milligrams per ounce died in about ten
hours, while a _C. durissus_ receiving 12.5 milligrams per ounce
succumbed in 45 minutes. An alligator receiving 6 milligrams per ounce
died in 14 hours. Even the snakes that survived showed some degree of
swelling.
The studies of Keegan and Andrews (1942:252) show that king-snakes are
sometimes killed by poisonous snakes. A _Lampropeltis calligaster_
injected with _A. contortrix_ venom (0.767 milligrams per gram) died
five days following the injection. This amount was more than twice the
amount of _A. piscivorus_ venom injected into a _L. getulus_ by Allen
(1937) in which the snake showed no ill effects. Keegan and Andrews
(_loc. cit._) stated that success in overpowering and eating poisonous
snakes by _Lampropeltis_ and _Drymarchon_ may be due to the ability to
avoid bites rather than to immunity to the venom. However, Rosenfeld and
Glass (1940) demonstrated that the plasma of _L. g. getulus_ had an
inhibiting effect on the hemorrhagic action on mice of the venoms of
several vipers.
One of the more extensive studies on effects of venoms on snakes is that
by Swanson (1946:242-249). In his studies freshly extracted liquid venom
was used. His studies indicated that snakes are not immune to venom of
their own kind or to closely related species. Copperhead venom killed
copperheads faster than did other venoms but took more time to kill
massasaugas, cottonmouths, and timber rattlers. However, most of the
snakes were able to survive normal or average doses of venom although
they are not necessarily immune to it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account