Natural History of Cottonmouth Moccasin, Agkistrodon piscovorus (Reptilia)Burkett, Ray D.
Science
Natural History of Cottonmouth Moccasin, Agkistrodon piscovorus (Reptilia)
Burkett, Ray D.
Agkistrodon piscivorus; Snakes
One of the major problems in comparing the data on toxicity of venom in
studies of this type is that no standard method of estimating toxicity
has been used. Swanson's (_loc. cit._) amount of venom equalling one
minim (M.L.D.?) ranged from 0.058 to 0.065 cubic centimeters. There were
no different values given for each species, but the time that elapsed
from injection of the venom to death represented the toxicity. There
also was no attempt in his study to convert the amount of venom used
into a ratio of the volume of venom per weight of snake, making the
results somewhat difficult to interpret. Additional work in this field
should provide for many injections into many individuals of several size
classes. The studies to date have been on far too few individuals to
allow statistical analyses to be accurate.
THE BITE
Effects of the Bite
Factors determining the outcome of snakebite are: size, health, and
species of snake; individual variation of venom toxicity of the species;
age and size of the victim; allergic or immune responses; location of
the bite; and the amount of venom injected and the depth to which it is
injected. The last factor is one of the most variable, owing to (1)
character and thickness of clothing between the snake and the victim's
skin, (2) accuracy of the snake's strike, and (3) size of the snake,
since a large snake can deliver more venom and at a greater depth than
can a small snake.
Pope and Perkins (1944) demonstrated that pit-vipers of the United
States bite as effectively as most innocuous snakes and that a careful
study of the bite may reveal the location of the pocket of venom, size
of the snake, and possibly its generic identity (see Dentition). The
bite pattern of the cottonmouth as well as the other crotalids showed
the typical fang punctures plus punctures of teeth on both the pterygoid
and mandible. Even so, a varying picture may be presented because from
one to four fang marks may be present. At times in the fang-shedding
cycle three and even four fangs can be in operation simultaneously.
Various authors have attributed death of the prey to the following
causes: paralysis of the central nervous system, paralysis of the
respiratory center, asphyxiation from clotting of the blood, stoppage of
the heart, urine suppression due to crystallized hemoglobin in the
kidney tubules, dehydration of the body following edema in the area of
the bite, or tissue damage. Mouths of snakes are reservoirs for
infectious bacteria, which are especially prolific in damaged tissue.
Bacterial growth is aided by the venom which blocks the bactericidal
power of the blood.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account