Navies of the world : $b giving concise descriptions of the plans, armament and armor of the naval vessels of twenty of the principal nations.Very, Edward W. (Edward Wilson)
History
Navies of the world : $b giving concise descriptions of the plans, armament and armor of the naval vessels of twenty of the principal nations.
The Bellerophon shows the same arrangement of keel and keelson with the
addition of wooden bilge-keels secured lightly to the bottom plates by
angle-irons. The framing of this ship, however, is of the type known as
the bracket-plate system. The features of this system are the adoption
of a double bottom and of angle-irons connected by bracket-plates
instead of by solid forged iron-work. The web of the frame in this
instance is much deeper, giving a large space between the outer plating
and the bottom formed by plating the floor edge of the transverse
frames. In the Warrior it will be noticed this plating only extended
to the third longitudinal on each side, while in the Bellerophon it
reaches to the wing-passage bulkhead. The transverse inner angle-iron
is continuous from bulwark to bulwark, the outer one being in short
lengths to allow continuous longitudinals. The upper angle-irons of
the longitudinal frames notch down over the transverse frames, while
the lower ones are continuous. The spaces between the bracket-frames
lighten the assemblage a great deal, while the longitudinals, being of
continuous plate like the inner keel, are lightened by having holes cut
in them. In this manner large water-tight compartments are secured; for
the inner keel, the third longitudinal, and the wing-passage bulkhead
longitudinal are solid. The web just underneath the armor-shelf is of
the old-style solid plate, to give better support than would be gained
by bracket-plates. The double-bottom arrangement continues throughout
two thirds of the length of the ship, the frames outside of this
being reduced in dimensions. The armor-shelf of the Warrior proving
a weak construction, that of the Bellerophon was better worked. The
outer angle was formed by an angle-iron bolted to the vertical outside
plating, and to a flat plate forming the armor-seat, the iron being on
the inside of each plate. This left an open joint between the lower
edge of the plating and the upper edge of the side-plate, but the joint
is one easily calked.
[Illustration: Filled Wing-Passage of Hercules.]
[Illustration: Floor of Hercules.]
In the Hercules the bracket-plate system is quite similar, and
additional strengthening was put in by partially filling the
wing-spaces with a strake of heavy teak backing. Two box-keelsons
were also run on each side of the main keelson, and the main keelson
itself was strengthened by being carried up above the floor and braced
by brackets on each side. The armor-shelf in this instance was also
slightly modified.
In the Invincible the wing-passage and its bulkhead is done away
with, and in place of it the web of the transverse frame is deepened
considerably, carrying the double-bottom arrangement up to the
armor-shelf; and whilst retaining a good depth as security against the
outer skin being broken by ramming, much space is gained in the hold.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account