Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.Van Evrie, John H.
History
Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.
Van Evrie, John H.
African Americans; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States
Of course, no comparison proper can be made with so shadowy and
intangible a thing as this. It is not a condition—it is only an attempt
after that which neither has nor can have an existence. If it had been
assumed simply that the _status_ of the negro was wrong at the South,
and that some other _status_ was proper for him, then possibly an
experiment would have been legitimate. But, as it was assumed that the
negro was a Caucasian, whose color merely was different, and naturally
entitled to the position of the white man, all these efforts were made
to reduce the assumption to practice, and compel him to live out the
life of the former. There could be and can be only a single end to such
effort. God created him a negro, a different and inferior being, and of
course no human power could alter or modify, to the millionth part of an
atom, the work of the Eternal. That which destroys a creature, or under
which he dies, can never be right, or even approach to that which is
right. When nature is so outraged that she refuses to indorse the human
action, or when she in mercy interposes her power to limit such action,
then we can not possibly mistake the wrong we are doing, or attempting
to do. It is an historical fact that slaves never propagated while in
that condition, and the supply was constantly kept up by fresh wars and
increased captives. It was such a stupendous outrage on the natural
relations, that men of the same species bear to each other, or on that
natural and unchangeable equality common to the race, that nature
refused to propagate it, or to consent to its permanent existence.
Nature also refuses offspring to prostitution—that terrible cancer so
corrupting to Northern society, and who does not see her wisdom and
beneficence in thus refusing a permanent existence to so foul a blot on
the sexual relations? So, too, in the case of mulattoism, where a
monstrous violation of the physical integrity of the races is involved,
nature interposes and forbids it to live. And in incest—the violation of
the laws of consanguinity, where relatives intermarry—nature
appropriately punishes them, through the idiocy and impotency of their
offspring, which is always forbidden to exist beyond a determinate
period. Free negroism, therefore—the attempt to force a different and
inferior being to live out the life of a different and superior being—is
not a condition, and can not be compared with that which is, or that
which the higher law of nature grants, a fixed order of life. There are,
then, only two possible conditions for the negro—isolation or
juxtaposition with the white man—African heathenism or subordination to
a master—a blank in the economy of the universe, or the social order of
the South, where he is an important element in the civilization,
progress, and general welfare of both races. It is not in the scope of
this work to treat of the natural relations or social adaptations of
other races. They must be determined by experience, though the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account