Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.Van Evrie, John H.
History
Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.
Van Evrie, John H.
African Americans; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States
million of industrious and productive negroes, is less prosperous than
New York, but if she will transform them into half a million of idle,
non-productive, and good-for-nothing negroes, then she will rapidly
recover from her present depressed condition. But enough—these people
who set up an abstraction entirely nonsensical, must reach conclusions
equally preposterous. They are not only ignorant of what they argue
about so pompously, but they imagine conditions that not only do not but
can not exist, either here or elsewhere, in our own times or any other,
in the existing, or any other world.
Virginia, Kentucky, all of the transition States, all the States with
considerable negro populations that are in the temperate latitudes, are,
of course, less productive than those bordering on them with entire
white populations, for the negro is greatly inferior in his industrial
capabilities, as in all other respects, where white men can labor. Thus
far there can be no doubt, for there is no room for doubt, but it by no
means follows that the people of Ohio or Pennsylvania are in a better
condition than those of Kentucky and Virginia. The people of Virginia,
if not homogeneous in race, are so in interest, and that one great fact
underlying the social condition, is itself, or in the results that flow
from it, of vast benefit. The interests of the State, of all its people,
the “slaveholder,” “non-slaveholder,” and the negro or so-called slave,
are homogeneous, universal, and indivisible, and therefore without
social conflict, or causes for social conflict, the tendencies of the
social order are harmonious and beneficent. The only seeming conflict or
the sole thing that superficial thinkers might mistake for such, is the
fact that the negro is not adapted to the locality, and they might
suppose that therefore the owner of his services, or of this so-called
slave property, might, to a certain extent, monopolize the soil that of
right belonged to the white laborer. But a moment’s reflection will be
sufficient to convince any rational mind of the unsoundness of this
supposition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account