Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.Van Evrie, John H.
History
Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.
Van Evrie, John H.
African Americans; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States
But the planters of the South, unlike the farmers of the North, were an
educated class, and fully competent to compete with the great leaders of
the Northern oligarchy. Their ideas were widely advanced beyond those of
the Northern farmer, but their _interests_ were identical—those of
agriculture, of production, of labor, of democracy, of manhood against
privilege, and therefore they naturally fought the battle against strong
government and class distinctions. The government actually adopted was,
with the exception of a life tenure in its judicial department,
substantially that which was originally advised by the leading minds of
the South, and which, instead of being supreme and absolute over the
States, as desired by the Northern leaders, was, with certain
well-defined exceptions, as utterly powerless and indeed disconnected
with the States as the government of England, or any other foreign
power. And perhaps no higher or more patriotic example can be found in
all history than that of the graceful assent and acceptance of the
Northern leaders, when they consented to adopt the present system. As
has been said, it was no selfish or base spirit that prompted their
desire for a strong government. They saw that the great body of the
people were ignorant; all history and all experience warranted them, as
they believed, in retaining power in the hands of the few who then
possessed it—in a word, they could not rise above the circumstances that
surrounded them, or act otherwise than in conformity with their mental
habits. But when fairly beaten in the convention and the great forum of
popular discussion—for when the ideas of Jefferson and other Southern
leaders were brought before the Northern masses, thousands of earnest
and enthusiastic apostles of these new and glorious truths sprung up in
every direction—then Hamilton and his associates generously assented to
the adoption of the present system, and became its warmest advocates.
They in no respect changed their views of government, but they became
convinced that these views were then impracticable, and however
unquestioned their ascendency at the North, that the Southern States
would never consent to any union on such basis, and as a federal union
on almost any terms was essential to the maritime States, they had the
magnanimity to accede to the Southern or democratic view embodied in the
present government, and to become, as has been said, the warmest
advocates for its adoption before the people. But if this patriotic and
high-minded course of Hamilton and the great leaders of Northern
opinion, which thus, it may be said, secured to the country and to the
world the noblest government ever known in human annals, is worthy of
the esteem and admiration of posterity, what a stupendous and boundless
benefit Jefferson, Madison, George Mason, and their associates, who not
alone assented to, but who originated this government, have conferred
upon posterity, and indeed the race itself!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account