Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.Van Evrie, John H.
History
Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.
Van Evrie, John H.
African Americans; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States
It has been shown, moreover, that both of these great men and those who
acted with them were equally honest and equally patriotic; that neither,
nor any of them could rise above the level of opinion in their
respective sections, for then they would no longer have been
representative men or able to influence the people; that the opinions of
Hamilton reflected the mental habits of the North which clung to the
forms and spirit of the British system founded on artificial
distinctions, while Jefferson, reflecting with equal fidelity the mental
habits that originate in a different social condition—where a
subordinate race is in juxtaposition—advocated a democratic system
resting on the fixed and indestructible laws of nature. And in view of
all these historical facts and inductive facts the conclusion was deemed
irresistible that the presence of the negro element in our midst, the
existence of a natural substratum in the social elements which thus
secured the liberty of our own race—the legal and political equality of
white men—was the happiest event or conjunction of circumstances that
has ever happened in the history of mankind. But while the great
northern leaders thus consented to the establishment of a democratic
system they were driven on by their own tendencies as well as the mental
habits of their people to neutralize its forces and to pervert its
spirit. At that period suffrage was extremely limited, while the
agricultural class in the Northern States—compared with the present—may
be said to have been extremely ignorant.
The northern or federal party were thus enabled to get possession of the
new government and to give it such direction as their opinions and
interests doubtless seemed to demand. The President himself—the
illustrious Washington—was without decided political convictions. His
instincts and his family traditions, it is believed, inclined him in the
direction of the northern party, while the local tendencies of
opinion—the general mental habits of the Virginians to regard the
distinctions of race as the legitimate basis of political
order—generally restrained him, and in the mighty conflict of opinion
kept him in a neutral position. He formed his cabinet out of wholly
incongruous materials, made Jefferson Secretary of State, and Hamilton
Secretary of the Treasury, and selecting other exponents of the
conflicting opinions, sought to neutralize the contending forces by an
equal selection of subordinates from the hostile camps.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account