Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.Van Evrie, John H.
History
Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.
Van Evrie, John H.
African Americans; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States
Thus the Middle States, the great agricultural populations of the North,
who, unaided and alone were powerless in the grasp of the federal party,
led as that party was by the intellect, and sustained by the wealth and
social prestige of the North, found themselves naturally allied with the
agricultural populations of the South who were led by men quite the
equals in general attainments, and vastly the superiors in political
knowledge, of the great northern leaders. These men—Jefferson, Madison,
George Clinton, and their associates—had already conquered in the great
intellectual contest that had preceded the creation of the government,
and though in the great battle now pending, the centralists occupied
vantage ground, for their banks, state debts, and consolidated federal
powers, attracted to their standards all the selfish interests and
mercenary influences in the country, the former again carried the day,
and in the great civil revolution of 1800 restored the government, as
Mr. Jefferson expressed it, to “the republican tack.” This restoration
of the federal government to its original purposes was surely second
only to the revolution of 1776 in importance, and without it it is
obvious that the fruits of the former must measurably have been lost. As
has been seen, the northern masses were at that time wholly unable to
contend with the opposing minority which embraced within its ranks the
wealth, talent, education, and social influence of the day. And though
largely in the majority as regards numbers, it was powerless even as
regards physical force, for it was without leaders to direct its
energies or to cope successfully with that brilliant array of able and
accomplished civilians and soldiers that gathered about the
administration and directed the councils of the federal party. If the
rule of the federalists in the course of time became personally
oppressive—if that personal “freedom” which in England permits the
_subject_ to enjoy locomotion as he pleases and protects his person from
violence were stricken down, then it may be supposed that the northern
masses would have resisted, and, perhaps, in the progress of the future
have overthrown such government.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account