Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.Van Evrie, John H.
History
Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.
Van Evrie, John H.
African Americans; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States
moment convulsed with anger, then lit up with genius, or with pride and
pomp of conscious power, and in another reflecting, perhaps, all a
woman’s sweetness or a child’s gentleness. Color, of course, is
essential to this, for a display of the passions and emotions on the
dark ground-work of the negro skin would be as impossible as a rainbow
at midnight, but without the deeply cut and distinctly marked features
of the Caucasian, color would be comparatively useless in reflecting the
grander emotions of the soul. Any one referring to his own experience
for a moment will see how impossible, as a mere physical matter, that
the negro face can reflect the qualities attributed to him by those who
are ignorant of his real nature. The narrow and receding forehead, the
shallow eyes, flat nose, almost on a level with the cheeks, the
protruding and enormous lips,—the only thing that really can be said to
be distinct in the negro face,—the _tout ensemble_ without form or
meaning when contrasted with the white man, is, in connection with the
color, the dark ground of the negro skin, clearly incapable of
reflecting certain qualities of our own race. The negro has, of course,
moral emotions, as have all human creatures, and his face, like that of
the Caucasian, is capable of reflecting all _his_ wants, his likes and
dislikes, his hopes and fears, but every one who has seen him must
_know_ that the higher qualities of the Caucasian cannot find expression
in the negro features, and therefore he does not possess those
qualities, or, as has been said, the All-Wise and Almighty Creator of
all has committed a fatal mistake, and unjustly endowed him with
qualities which he is forever forbidden to express!
CHAPTER IX.
LANGUAGE.
A few years since, an eminent historian, in a public lecture, discussed
the probabilities of a universal language as an instrument of universal
history, and as means for the universal civilization of mankind! Another
public lecturer discussing this subject, and on a professedly scientific
basis, held that language had a miraculous origin, though the period
when this supernatural gift was conferred on man was left wholly to the
imagination of his audience. Others, and among them Buffon, Pritchard,
and even several ethnologists, have scarcely risen above this nonsense,
while their uses or application of this faculty have been vastly more
injurious to science than even their original misconceptions on the
general subject.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account