Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.Van Evrie, John H.
History
Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.
Van Evrie, John H.
African Americans; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States
their own destruction, and sooner or later fall a conquest to ruder and
simpler societies, the intellectual superiority of the white man always
enables him to conquer inferior races, whatever may be the disparity of
numbers, and Clive with three thousand Europeans, attacking the Hindoo
horde of one hundred thousand, or Cortez invading Mexico with five
hundred followers, amply illustrates the natural supremacy of the
Caucasian race. But, on the contrary, if the Aztecs had had the
intellectual capacity of the Caucasian superadded to their own specific
qualities—the strength and acuteness of the senses—common to the native
race, not alone would Cortez have failed to conquer them, but it may be
doubted if all Europe, combined together for that purpose, could have
accomplished it.
There are no examples for testing the capabilities of negroes in these
respects, for there is no instance in history where they have contested
the supremacy of the white man, the insurrection in Hayti having been
the work of the “colored people” and mulattoes, and the negroes only
forced into it by their fears after the outbreak was complete. But we
have the actual physical facts as well as our every-day experience of
the negro qualities, and therefore can arrive at positive truth when
comparing him with the superior race. The large distribution of nervous
matter to the organs of sense and consequent dominating sensualism (not
mere animalism), is the direct cause of that extreme sloth and indolence
universal with the race. The small brain and limited reasoning power of
the negro render him incapable of comprehending the wants of the future,
while the sloth dependent on the dominating sensualism, together with
strong animal appetites impelling him always to gross self-indulgence,
render a master guide or protector essential to his own welfare. Indeed
it may be matter of doubt which is the paramount cause of the negro’s
inability to provide for future necessities—his limited reasoning power
or his indolence—his small brain or his dominating sensualism. It is a
statistical _fact_ that “free” negroes do not produce sufficient for
their support, and consequently that they tend perpetually to
extinction, and when it is remembered that the small brain and feeble
intellectual power render them incapable of reasoning on the future
rewards of self-denial, and that the large distribution of nervous
matter in the organs of sense, and the consequent sensualism impels them
to gross indulgence of the present, and moreover that they are in
juxtaposition, and must contend with white people, then it is plain
enough to see that it could not be otherwise, and that the total
extinction of these unfortunate beings is necessarily a question of time
alone.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account