Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.Van Evrie, John H.
History
Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.
Van Evrie, John H.
African Americans; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States
All the nice manipulations in surgery, in the arts, in painting,
statuary, and the thousands of delicate fabrics seen every day and all
about us, demand both intellect and delicacy of hand, and these, too, in
that complete perfection found alone in the Caucasian. The sense of
touch, on the contrary, in the negro is not in the hand or fingers, or
only partially so, but spreads all over the surface and envelops the
entire person. The hand itself, in its mere mechanism, is incompatible
with delicate manipulation. The coarse, blunt, webbed fingers of the
negress, for example, even if we could imagine delicacy of touch and
intellect to direct, could not in any length of time or millions of
years be brought to produce those delicate fabrics or work those
exquisite embroideries which constitute the pursuits or make up the
amusements of the Caucasian female. The mechanism of the negro hand, the
absence or rather the obtuseness of the sense of touch in the fingers,
and the limited negro intellect, therefore, utterly forbid that negroes
shall be mechanics, except it be in those grosser trades, such as
coopers, blacksmiths, etc., which need little more than muscular
strength and industry to practice them. But the sense of touch, though
feeble in the hand or fingers, is none the less largely developed as are
the other senses of the negro, and spreads over the whole surface of the
body. This is witnessed every day at the South, where whipping, as with
Northern children, is the ordinary punishment of negroes. As in all
other foolish notions that spring from the one great misconception—that
negroes have the same nature as white people, the “anti-slavery” people
of the North and of Europe labor under a ludicrous mistake in respect to
this matter. They take their notions of flogging from the practice of
the British army and the Russian knout, where strong men are cut to
pieces by the “cat” or beaten to death by clubs, and they suppose that
precisely similar barbarity is practiced on the “poor slave.” And the
runaway negro has doubtless added to these notions, perhaps, without
meaning it. At Abolition conventicles he is expected, of course, to
horrify the crowd with awful tales of his sufferings, but having always
had plenty to eat and never overworked, he has really nothing to fall
back on but the “cruel whippings,” which the imaginations of the former
readily transform into their own notions, but which, in fact, correspond
to that which they deal out to their own children without a moment’s
compunction. The sensibility of the negro skin closely resembles that of
childhood, and while there are doubtless cases of great barbarity in
these respects, as we all know there are in cases of children, the
ordinary flogging of negroes is much the same as that which parents,
guardians, teachers, etc., deal out to white children, and the “terrible
lash” so dolefully gloated over by the ignorant and deluded usually
dwindles down into a petty switch in reality.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account