NetWorld! What People Are Really Doing on the Internet and What It Means to YouRothman, David H.
General
NetWorld! What People Are Really Doing on the Internet and What It Means to You
Rothman, David H.
Internet
Given the global nature of both encryption technology and copyright law,
the whole world should be watching Washington’s policies. The Clinton
Administration, after all, hopes to internationalize the same mindset
that could send Phil Zimmermann to jail; in fact, many of the American
export controls _are_ in effect in other countries, raising the
possibility that an Australian or a British hacker could end up someday
in the same predicament. In the pages that follow I’ll tell about the
battles that Zimmermann and his allies have fought with Washington.
You’ll read, too, of my fight for an alternative to the Lehmanesque
copyright law. My little case history suggests that the White House is
not so eager to listen to ordinary mortals who speak up on the Net.
Clinton’s people would rather pander to the usual campaign contributors.
So far at least, pious rhetoric notwithstanding, they have basically
neglected the need to put the public library system online with free or
low-cost books from the private sector. Video just might end up reigning
even more supreme than it does today—at the expense of abstract thought
and democracy. Winston Smith would not be happy.
PGP and the Fight for Privacy—and
Against Clipper—on the Internet
Father Bill Morton, an Anglican priest in Woodstock, New Brunswick,
could take confessions via e-mail without violating his vows. Encryption
software guarded the privacy of his communications. In Florida a bright
teenager without any vices—but with a nosy mother—could protect her
diaries. And in New York, an employee of a leading investment house
could routinely guard his credit card number. The same software made it
possible for thousands to use the Net for confidential business
transactions. At the same time, democratic activists in the former
Soviet Union would be able protect their messages if tyranny returns.
The name for this encryption package was PGP and by 1995 it was as much
a cause as a program. Thousands had downloaded it off the Internet and
other networks. Named in tribute to Ralph’s Pretty Good Grocery on
Garrison Keillor’s radio show, PGP stood for Pretty Good Privacy. PGP
lived up to its name—people needed it. Part of the reason was the nature
of the Net itself. A skilled hacker could intercept unencrypted e-mail
more easily than on the regular commercial networks. Mail often passed
through computers at a number of universities and companies before
reaching its destination. Without question the best way to protect the
contents of your outgoing mail was to scramble its message before you
sent it into cyberspace.
PGP was also popular because its use showed that the Net would never
accept Clipper chip encryption schemes—designed to make it easier for
the government to snoop on citizens.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account