NetWorld! What People Are Really Doing on the Internet and What It Means to YouRothman, David H.
General
NetWorld! What People Are Really Doing on the Internet and What It Means to You
Rothman, David H.
Internet
All those irksome constitutional details aside, the NSA’s plan might
actually have made sense once. The people at Fort Meade had done the
United States a service by staying ahead of Soviet encryption in the era
of tail fins and air raid drills. But today such an approach was about
as appropriate as a backyard bomb shelter. As far back as the 1970s, two
men outside NSA’s control had invented public key encryption, which, as
noted before, was a good way for strangers to exchange secure messages
and authenticate their identities from the start. Whitfield Diffie was a
mathematician, computer scientist, and encryption expert. Martin Hellman
was an electronic engineer. Both were grouchy about a computer system
whose users had to entrust their passwords to the systems managers. So
they came up with public key encryption—the same principle that was
behind the RSA approach used in PGP, and now available from Boston to
Brisbane.
Even Bill Clinton couldn’t repeal the past. Just as the Kennedy
Administration had justified Castro’s paranoia, so the Clinton
Administration worked hard to do the same with that of the Cypherpunks.
This time Washington wouldn’t deploy humans. Instead it wanted to rely
on a little computer chip that Steven Levy described as “just another
tiny square of plastic covering a silicon thicket.”
“Tumor-sized” might have been more apropos. Clipper, in fact, was a
tumor of sorts.
In a human body a tumor serves itself, not its host. And that’s what
Clipper was supposed to do. The Clinton Administration wanted to license
Clipper to the private sector, where it would show up in millions of
telephones and dominate the market—displacing future encryption schemes
based on technologies such as PGP. Washington hoped to make Clipper too
cheap to resist and to provide a federal market for Clipper products.
AT&T and the rest could put Clipper in telephones, and then, supposedly,
dope peddlers couldn’t peddle and terrorists couldn’t terrorize without
the Feds having a chance to intercept their conversations. The
government would also work to make computers snoop friendly.
That was the scenario. Like tumors these government-issue chips were to
spread—not only in the States but also overseas. Eventually the Feds
would also announce plans to make Clipper available through software,
rather than just through the chip. Whatever the incarnation of Clipper,
though, Washington would play down the fact that it would corrode the
country’s constitutional right to privacy. America’s Winston Smiths
would have to trust a government that had covered up an unhealthy number
of deaths from nuclear fallout, given us Watergate, and illegally spied
on thousands of Americans.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account