NetWorld! What People Are Really Doing on the Internet and What It Means to YouRothman, David H.
General
NetWorld! What People Are Really Doing on the Internet and What It Means to You
Rothman, David H.
Internet
What’s more, if Bill Clinton and Al Gore really cared about protecting
citizens in a high-tech age, they would worry less about snooping on
citizens and more about hardening up points of vulnerability. Steele
noted how easily criminals could “maliciously interfere with the
computers that control the power system. It is relatively easy to
destroy computer capabilities—this takes much less skill than to ‘crack’
them and divert computing resources.” Also, terrorists could wreak havoc
with computers that controlled telephone systems in such areas as
communications for government and banking.
He also warned of interference with the computers of Wall Street and the
Federal Reserve. “Trillions in digital data” could vanish into the
ether. “A massive global economic panic” would ensue. Preventative
measures wouldn’t be cheap, but if the American government did care
about security, it would prepare realistically for the threats of the
information era rather than doing an inept Big Brother act.
To rig up a whole nation for wire taps would be both a waste and a
disgrace. I pondered the ironies. Here the NSA and similar agencies were
supposed to protect normality—to guard families against dopesters, sex
perverts, terrorists, and the rest—and yet Phil Zimmermann the husband
and father might go to jail. “I think it’s kind of unreal to him,”
Zimmermann said when I asked how his son felt about this. “I tell him
that I have some talented lawyers working for me, and that we’re doing
the best we can.” And Zimmermann’s wife? “She thinks that they can’t
possibly indict me, because that would be wrong—that somehow they’ll
realize that and just back out. Of course by the time your book is
printed, we’ll know one way or the other whether she was right.”
A Few Words about Library Books,
Democracy, and Socks the Cybercat
The White House in the 1990s was extolling computer nets as a way to
Bring Government Closer to the People. Americans could dial up “An
Interactive Citizens’ Handbook” on the Internet, see a photo of a
teenaged Clinton with JFK, and listen to Socks the Clinton cat meow. But
could Clinton-Gore hear _us_? Just how “interactive” was the White
House?
Clinton boosters formed a group called Americans Communicating
Electronically to improve electronic contacts between mortals and
bureaucrats. Al Gore, meanwhile, had flaunted his typing skills with the
famous visit to CompuServe. But was electronic democracy truly alive on
the Internet and other computer networks? Not quite. All the techish
sizzle notwithstanding, Clinton-Gore might instead be giving us
electronic oligarchy, especially if Republicans followed the horrible
precedents that the White House was setting. Consider the dubious,
somewhat Orwellian process that was shaping the National Information
Infrastructure—the famous data highways and related endeavors.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account